Hazard class
|
Classification
|
Symbol
|
Signal word
|
Hazard statement
|
Precautionary statement
|
Rationale for the classification
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Oral)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Dermal)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases)
|
Not classified
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Based on a LDLo of >800,000 ppm/4h (SIDS (2005)) in a rat test (OECD TG403 (GLP)), the substance was classified as "Not classified".
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours)
|
Not applicable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Gas (GHS definition)
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists)
|
Not applicable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Gas (GHS definition)
|
2
|
Skin corrosion/irritation
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
3
|
Serious eye damage/eye irritation
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
4
|
Respiratory sensitization
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
4
|
Skin sensitization
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
5
|
Germ cell mutagenicity
|
Not classified
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Based on a negative result in an inhalation mouse bone marrow micronucleus test (OECD TG474) (in vivo somatic cell mutagenicity tests) (SIDS (2005)), the substance was classified as "Not classified". As relevant information, from in vitro tests, there are reports of a negative Ames test (SIDS (2005), PATTY (5th, 2001)), and negative chromosomal aberration tests using Chinese hamster ovary cells and lung cells, and human lymphocytes (SIDS (2005), PATTY (5th, 2001)).
|
6
|
Carcinogenicity
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
7
|
Reproductive toxicity
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
In rat and rabbit developmental tests by inhalation exposure during organogenesis period (OECD TG414), no adverse effects on fetal development were reported under condition where general toxicity in maternal animals (unsteady gait for rats, decreased food consumption for rabbits) were manifested (SIDS (2005)). However, classification was not possible due to lack of data for sexual function and fertility.
|
8
|
Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No mortality or significant clinical signs other than transient body weight loss were observed after inhalation exposure to rats at approximately 500,000 to 700,000 ppm (ECETOC JACC (1994)). At 800,000 ppm, clinical signs such as ataxic gait and abnormal respiration were observed in all exposed rats but disappeared one hour after the exposure and no remarkable findings were observed during pathology examinations (SIDS (2005)). Although the substance corresponds to "Not classified" with inhalation exposure since these test concentrations exceed the upper limit of the guidance value range, classification was not possible due to lack of data with other exposure routes (oral and dermal).
|
9
|
Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
In 4-week (OECD TG412) and 13-week (OECD TG413) inhalation tests with rats, no significantly toxic effects were observed. NOAECs were reported to be 50,000 ppm (90-day equivalent: 15386 ppm) and 50,000 ppm, respectively (SIDS (2005)). Although the substance corresponds to "Not classified" with inhalation exposure since NOAECs exceeded the upper limit of the guidance value range, classification was not possible due to lack of data with other exposure routes (oral and dermal).
|
10
|
Aspiration hazard
|
Not applicable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Gas (GHS definition)
|