GHS Classification Result

Chemical Name:1,4-Dihydroxyanthraquinone
CAS:81-64-1

Result:
ID: 21A3614
Classifier: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
Year Classified: FY2009
Reference Manual: GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Symbol Signal word Hazard statement Precautionary statement Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not applicable - - - - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules.
2 Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
3 Aerosols Not applicable - - - - Not aerosol products.
4 Oxidizing gases Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
5 Gases under pressure Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
6 Flammable liquids Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not applicable - - - - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not applicable - - - - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At).
13 Oxidizing liquids Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
14 Oxidizing solids Not applicable - - - - The substance contains oxygen which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen.
15 Organic peroxides Not applicable - - - - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible - - - - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available.

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Symbol Signal word Hazard statement Precautionary statement Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified - - - - Based on LD50 values of >2000 mg/kg, >5000 mg/kg, >10000 mg/kg and >20000 mg/kg for rats (IUCLID (2000)), the substance was classified into "Not classified".
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not applicable - - - - Solid (GHS definition)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible - - - - Although a LC50 was >1 mg/L/4h for rats (IUCLID (2000)), classification was not possible since determination of category was impossible. Since the LC50 value (1 mg/L) was higher than saturated vapour pressure concentration (3.1*10^-7 mg/L), the test was considered to be conducted for dusts.
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified - - - - Since there are results of "not irritating" in a Draize test, patch test and a rabbit 24-hour semi-occlusive application test and no irritation was observed in other rabbit tests (IUCLID (2000)), the substance was classified as "Not classified".
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Not classified - - - - Since there is a result of "not irritating" in a rabbit Draize test (IUCLID (2000)), and also no irritation was observed in other two rabbit tests (IUCLID (2000)), the substance was classified as "Not classified". As relevant information, there is a report of "mild irritating" in a rabbit test with 500 mg for 24-hour (RTECS (2003)).
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible - - - - Although there is a report of "not sensitizing" in a guinea pig test as information in List 2 (IUCLID (2000)), the test method is not clear. Additionally, there is a report of "not sensitizing" with SI value of 2.68 in a mouse LLNA test, but only one concentration (1%) was tested. Therefore, classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data.
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible - - - - Classification not possible due to lack of data from in vivo mutagenicity tests. From in vitro mutagenicity tests, there is a report of 5/7 positive results Ames tests (IUCLID (2000)). In addition, the substance is an existing chemical substance, for which mutagenicity was established under the provisions of Article 57-3 of the Industrial Safety and Health Law.
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible - - - - No data available.
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible - - - - No data available. As relevant information, there is a report that somnolene (general depressed activity) was noted at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg (LD50 value) in a rat oral test (RTECS (2003)).
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible - - - - No data available. As relevant information, there is a report that changes in erythrocyte count and conditioned vitamin deficiency were noted in a rat 30-day oral test (dose level: 50000 mg/kg/30-day) (RTECS (2003)).
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible - - - - No data available.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Symbol Signal word Hazard statement Precautionary statement Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) Category 1 Warning H400: Very toxic to aquatic life P273: Avoid release to the environment.
P391: Collect spillage.
P501: Dispose of contents/container to ...
Classified into Category 1 from its 48h-EC50 = 0.029 mg/L for Crustacea (Daphnia cucullata) (AQUIRE, 2010).
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) Category 1 Warning H410: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects P273: Avoid release to the environment.
P391: Collect spillage.
P501: Dispose of contents/container to ...
Classified into Category 1 since its acute toxicity is Category 1 and it is not rapidly degradable (BIOWIN).


NOTE:
* Classification was conducted by relevant Japanese Ministries in accordance with GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government, and is intended to provide a reference for preparing GHS labelling and SDS for users.
* This is a provisional English translation of classification results and is subject to revision without notice.
* The responsibility for any resulting GHS labelling and SDS referenced from this site is with users.

Reference:
Reference Manual

Definitions / Abbreviations

Model Label by MHLW

MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)

Model SDS by MHLW

MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)


To GHS Information