Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 118-69-4 |
Chemical Name | 2,6-Dichlorotoluene |
Substance ID | 24A6144 |
Classification year (FY) | FY2012 |
Ministry who conducted the classification | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE) |
New/Revised | New |
Classification result in other fiscal year | |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | Physical Hazards and Health Hazards: GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) Environmental Hazards: UN GHS Document (4th revised edition) |
UN GHS document (External link) | UN GHS document |
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Model Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | eChemPortal |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. |
2 | Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). There are two different melting points for this substance of 2.8 deg C (SIDS (1998)) (ICSC (J) 2009), etc. and 25.8 deg C (SRCPhysProp) (CRC (91st, 2010)), etc., but the substance was regarded as a liquid in GHS definition in this hazard class by adopting data in SIDS. |
3 | Aerosols | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Category 4 |
Warning |
H227 |
P370+P378
P403+P235 P210 P280 P501 |
It corresponds to Category 4 because a flash point of 79 deg C [closed-cup] (MSDS (Sigma-Aldrich) (Access on Dec. 2012)) is > 60 deg C and <= 93 deg C. |
7 | Flammable solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of > 500 deg C (Ullmanns (E) (6th, 2003)). |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing chlorine (but not fluorine or oxygen) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - |
No data available. Besides, as for health hazards, also refer to 2,4-dichlorotoluene (CAS RN 95-73-8), the isomer and related compound of this substance. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The classification is not possible due to no in vivo test data. Besides, as for in vitro tests, a negative result was obtained in both an Ames test and a chromosomal aberration test with CHL cells (JECDB (Access on Dec. 2012)). |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H361 |
P308+P313
P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
It is reported that in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with rats (OECD TG422, GLP) (doses: 0, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 mg/kg), an increase in the number of dead offspring and decreased neonatal survival were observed in the groups at or above 300 mg/kg where decreased spontaneous activity, reduced weight gain, and effects on the kidney and liver were found in maternal animals (JECDB (Access on Dec. 2012)). It is described in the report that bad lactation conditions of maternal animals caused the decreased neonatal survival, etc., however, it was classified in Category 2 according to the criteria in the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government. Besides, there were no effects on copulation ability and fertility and no abnormalities in parturition status in the test. |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | In a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with rats (OECD TG422, GLP) (doses: 0, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 mg/kg), principal findings were reduced weight gain in males and histological ones of centrilobular hypertrophy of hepatocytes in the liver in males and females, vacuolar and fatty degeneration in the proximal tubules in the kidney in females, and atrophy of the thymus in females, which were observed at or above 300 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 140 mg/kg/day) above the guidance value range. Furthermore, as the effect of the administration of the low dose corresponding to the guidance value range, only an increase in eosinophilic bodies in the kidney was found at or above 100 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 47 mg/kg/day) (JECDB (Access on Dec. 2012)), but it was hard to use this finding alone as the rationale for classification due to no related changes. And because it is unknown whether the above effects seen at 300 mg/kg/day occur at doses within the guidance value range, it was classified as "Classification not possible." |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 |
P273
P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 48-hour EC50 = 0.38 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2006)). |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) | Category 2 |
- |
H411 |
P273
P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 2 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, a degradation rate by BOD: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1996)), and 21-day NOEC = 0.32 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (SIDS, 2002). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, a degradation rate by BOD: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1996)), and 96-hour LC50 = 6.4 mg/L for fish (Oryzias latipes) (SIDS, 2002). From the above results, it was classified in Category 2. |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. |
|