GHS Classification Result

日本語で表示



GENERAL INFORMATION
Item Information
CAS RN 13674-84-5
Chemical Name Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate
Substance ID 25A0012
Classification year (FY) FY2013
Ministry who conducted the classification Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
New/Revised New
Classification result in other fiscal year  
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2013)
UN GHS document (External link) UN GHS document
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) Definitions/Abbreviations
Model Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) eChemPortal

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not applicable
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.
2 Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
3 Aerosols Not applicable
-
-
- - Not aerosol products.
4 Oxidizing gases Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
5 Gases under pressure Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" based on a flash point of 185 deg C (closed cup) (SIDS (2009)).
7 Flammable solid Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not applicable
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of > 500 deg C (IUCLID (2000)).
10 Pyrophoric solids Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified
-
-
- - From information: water solubility of 1.6g /L (IUCLID (2000)), it is recognized that it does not react vigorously with water.
13 Oxidizing liquids Classification not possible
-
-
- - It is an organic compound which does not contain fluorine but contains oxygen and chlorine, and the oxygen is chemically bonded to the element other than carbon or hydrogen (P). However, the classification is not possible due to no data.
14 Oxidizing solids Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
15 Organic peroxides Not applicable
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule.
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
There are reports on LD50 values of > 500 mg/kg (males), 632 mg/kg (females), 707 mg/kg (females), 1,011 mg/kg (females), < 2,000 mg/kg (males), 2,800 mg/kg (females), and 3,300 mg/kg (females) for rats (all EU-RAR (2008)). It was classified in Category 4 to which the most data correspond.
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" based on LD50 values of > 12.9 g/kg (EU-RAR (2008)), and > 2,000 mg/kg (NICNAS (2001), SIDS (2009)) for rats, and LD50 values of > 2,000 mg/kg (EU-RAR (2008), NICNAS (2001)) and > 5,000 mg/kg (EU-RAR (2008)) for rabbits.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" based on reports on LC50 values (4 hours) of 4.6 mg/L (SIDS (2009)), > 5.05 mg/L (males), about 5 mg/L (females), and > 7 mg/L (EU-RAR (2008)) for rats. Besides, based on the description of aerosol, a reference value of dust and mists in the unit of mg/L was applied.
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - In SIDS (2009), there are four reports on test results on this substance including products. Among them, in a representative Draize test with rabbits, a primary irritation score was 0.5 out of 8, and there was no difference between normal skin and damaged skin. Furthermore, primary irritation scores after 24 and 72 hours were 0.5 out of 8 and 0.0 out of 8, respectively, and there was almost no irritation. Therefore, it was classified as "Not classified."
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Not classified
-
-
- - In SIDS (2009), there are reports on five test results on this substance including products. Among them, in a representative Draize test with rabbits, average scores after 1, 24, 48, 72 hours were 3, 0, 0, 0 out of 110, respectively, and eye irritation was not observed. Therefore, it was classified as "Not classified."
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - It was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was not possible to classify a substance as "Not classified" according to the revised GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government. As for in vivo, it was negative in micronucleus tests with peripheral blood of mice and rats and a chromosomal aberration test with rat bone marrow cells (EU-RAR (2008), NTP DB (Access on August 2013)). And it was negative in a comet assay with rat liver (EU-RAR (2008)). As for in vitro, it was positive or negative in mouse lymphoma tests with cultured mammalian cells, and negative in a bacterial reverse mutation test (ATSDR (2012), EU-RAR (2008), NTP DB (Access on August 2013)). Among these, the positive result in the mouse lymphoma test was "small colony" and was thought to result from chromosomal aberrations. However, it was negative for chromosomal aberrations in vivo as mentioned above, therefore it was judged not to cause chromosomal aberrations. Besides, it is described in NICNAS (2001) that it was not genotoxic in vivo and in vitro.
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
7 Reproductive toxicity Category 2


Warning
H361 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
Teratogenicity was not observed in a developmental toxicity test and a two-generation reproductive toxicity test with rats in the oral route (feeding). In the two-generation reproductive toxicity test with rats in the oral route (feeding), effects on estrus cycles and uterus weight and developmental failure of offspring were found (EU-RAR (2008), SIDS (2009)). Therefore, it was judged to be Category 2.
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (central nervous system), Category 3 (narcotic effects)



Warning
H371
H336
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
After oral administration, rats showed symptoms thought to be via the central nervous system such as increased or decreased activity, ptosis, hunched posture, tremors, clonic/tonic convulsions, sporadic twisting, aggression, teeth chattering, salivation, red-brown staining around the mouth, diarrhea, piloerection, rough coat, alopecia, dehydration, hypothermia, emaciation, dyspnea within the guidance value range for Category 2 (464-2,000 mg/kg). Therefore, it was classified in Category 2 (central nervous system). Furthermore, because decreased activity, partially or completely closed eyes, body weight depression, alopecia, convulsions, dyspnea were observed after inhalation exposure (mist) in rats outside the guidance value range (5.05 mg/L) (SIDS (2009), EU-RAR (2008)), it was classified in Category 3 (narcotic effects).
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (liver, thyroid)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
It is described that in a 13-week diet administration test with rats, increased liver weight and thyroid follicular cell hyperplasia were observed in males at the dose (corresponding to 52 mg/kg/day) within the guidance values for Category 2 (EU-RAR (2008), IUCLID (2000)). In a 28-day gavage administration test with rats, effects on the liver (weight increase, hepatocyte hypertrophy, decreased serum ALT) were found only at the highest dose (1,000 mg/kg/day) (EU-RAR (2008), IUCLID (2000)). On the other hand, the effects on the thyroid were findings only in males, but they were judged to be of pathological importance. From the above, it was classified in Category 2 (liver, thyroid).
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) Category 3
-
-
H402 P273
P501
From 96-hour LC50 = 51 ppm for fish (Pimephales promelas) (EU-RAR, 2008), it was classified in Category 3.
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) Category 3
-
-
H412 P273
P501
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified as "Not classified" due to being not rapidly degradable (a 28-day degradation rate by BOD = 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1989)), and 72-hour NOEC (r) = 6 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (EU-RAR, 2008).
If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 3 due to being not rapidly degradable (a 28-day degradation rate by BOD = 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 2002)), and 96-hour LC50 = 51 ppm for fish (Pimephales promelas) (EU-RAR, 2008).
From the above results, it was classified in Category 3.
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol.


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.

To GHS Information