GHS Classification Result

日本語で表示



GENERAL INFORMATION
Item Information
CAS RN 111-91-1
Chemical Name Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Substance ID H27-A-034/C-064A_P
Classification year (FY) FY2015
Ministry who conducted the classification Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
New/Revised New
Classification result in other fiscal year  
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
UN GHS document (External link) UN GHS document
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) Definitions/Abbreviations
Model Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) eChemPortal

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not applicable
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive properties.
2 Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
3 Aerosols Not applicable
-
-
- - Not an aerosol product.
4 Oxidizing gases Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
5 Gases under pressure Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - A flash point is 103 degrees C (closed cup) (GESTIS (Access on July 2015)).
7 Flammable solids Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not applicable
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an ignition point of 395 degrees C (GESTIS (Access on July 2015)).
10 Pyrophoric solids Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - No established test method suitable for liquid substances.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not applicable
-
-
- - Not containing metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At).
13 Oxidizing liquids Not applicable
-
-
- - It is an organic compound which does not contain fluorine but contains oxygen and chlorine, and the oxygen and chlorine are not chemically bonded to the elements other than carbon or hydrogen.
14 Oxidizing solids Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
15 Organic peroxides Not applicable
-
-
- - It is an organic compound that does not contain bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule.
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to no data, the classification is not possible.

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 3


Danger
H301 P301+P310
P264
P270
P321
P330
P405
P501
From an LD50 value of 65 mg/kg for rats (NTP TR536 (2011)), it was classified in Category 3.
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Category 2


Danger
H310 P302+P352
P361+P364
P262
P264
P270
P280
P310
P321
P405
P501
From an LD50 value of 170 mg/kg for guinea pigs (NTP TR536 (2011)), it was classified in Category 2.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - "Liquids" according to GHS definition.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Category 1


Danger
H330 P304+P340
P403+P233
P260
P271
P284
P310
P320
P405
P501
From a reported LCLo value (4 hours) of 62 ppm for rats (Result of the initial environmental risk assessment of chemicals, Vol. 6, Ministry of the Environment in Japan: Tentative hazard assessment sheet (2008)) and an LC50 value (4 hours) within a range of 60 to 120 ppm from no deaths at 60 ppm and all deaths at 120 ppm reported in a 4-hour inhalation test in rats (NTP TR536 (2011)), it is estimated to be Category 1 or Category 2. Because deaths were found at 62 ppm, the substance was classified in Category 1 by adopting the Category with the higher hazard.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
Though there is no specific information, from the information that this substance is irritating to skin, it was classified in Category 2 (Result of the initial environmental risk assessment of chemicals, Vol. 6, Ministry of the Environment in Japan: Tentative hazard assessment sheet (2008); HSDB (Access on July 2015)).
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
It is written that this substance is irritating to eyes (Result of the initial environmental risk assessment of chemicals, Vol. 6, Ministry of the Environment in Japan: Tentative hazard assessment sheet (2008); HSDB (Access on July 2015)).
Besides, it is reported that irritation was not observed after application of 0.5 mL undiluted this substance to the conjunctival sac of rabbits (NTP TR (2011)).
From the above, the substance was classified in Category 2 by adopting the information with the higher hazard.
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - It was classified as "Classification not possible" in accordance with the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government.
As for in vivo, it is reported that a micronucleus test in rat bone marrow cells in gavage administration and a micronucleus test in mouse peripheral erythrocytes were negative (NTP TR536 (2011)), but a bacterial reverse mutation test was positive (NTP TR536 (2011)).
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - In a carcinogenicity test in which this substance dissolved in ethanol was dermally applied for 2 years (5 days/week) in rats or mice, increased incidences of tumors were not observed after administration up to the doses where inflammations and ulcers in forestomach and degeneration in liver in male rats and deaths and so on in female rats occurred and to the doses where deaths, ulcer in forestomach, and epidermal hyperplasia at application sites in male mice and degeneration, necrosis, and fibrosis of cardiac muscles and so on in male and female mice occurred. There is the comment that there is no evidence of carcinogenicity in either males or females of rats and mice under the conditions of this test (NTP TR536 (2011)). Therefore, it is conceivable that it corresponds to "Not classified" in a dermal route, but information on carcinogenicity in other routes and an epidemiological survey in humans is lacking.
As to classification by other organizations, there is only the classification result of D (not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity) by US EPA (IRIS Summary (Access on July 2015)).
From the above, the substance was classified as "Classification not possible" in accordance with the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government.
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (heart, respiratory organs)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
There is no human information.
As for experimental animals, in a 14-week (70 days) dermal administration toxicity test using rats, at 200 mg/kg/day (converted to a 90-day equivalent: 156 mg/kg/day) that is within a range of Category 2, vacuolization of muscle fiber cells and interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration in the heart, and necrosis of muscle fiber in the heart were observed (NTP TR536 (2011)). Moreover, in a 105-week dermal administration toxicity test using rats, at 150 mg/kg/day that is within a range of Category 2, degeneration of olfactory epithelium and inflammation of forestomach were found (NTP TR536 (2011)).
As above, effects on the heart, respiratory organs, and digestive tract were observed, but forestomach was not included in target organs because human does not have one.
Therefore, the substance was classified in Category 2 (heart, respiratory organs).
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Due to lack of data, the classification is not possible.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) Not classified
-
-
- - From 48-hour LC50 = 201 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (HSDB, 2003; AQUIRE, 2016), and 96-hour LC50 = 184 mg/L for fish (Pimephales promelas) (HSDB, 2003; AQUIRE, 2016), it was classified as "Not classified."
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) Not classified
-
-
- - Reliable chronic toxicity data were not obtained.
Due to being not insoluble in water (water solubility = 7800 mg/L, PHYSPROP Database, 2009), and "Not classified" in acute toxicity, it was classified as "Not classified."
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data.


NOTE:
* A blank or "-" in a cell of classification denotes that the classification of the hazard class was not conducted.
* Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement will show when hovering the mouse over a code of Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement.
Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement are also provided in the Excel file.
* Classification was conducted by relevant Japanese Ministries in accordance with GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government,
and is intended to provide a reference for preparing GHS labelling and SDS for users.
* This is a provisional English translation of classification results and is subject to revision without notice.
* The responsibility for any resulting GHS labelling and SDS referenced from this site is with users.
* Codes assigned to each of the hazard statements and codes for each of the precautionary statement are
based on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) in United Nations.

To GHS Information