GHS Classification Result

日本語で表示



GENERAL INFORMATION
Item Information
CAS RN 26447-14-3
Chemical Name 1,2-Epoxy-3-(tolyloxy)propane
Substance ID H29-B-077
Classification year (FY) FY2017
Ministry who conducted the classification Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
New/Revised Revised
Classification result in other fiscal year FY2008  
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
UN GHS document (External link) UN GHS document
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) Definitions/Abbreviations
Model Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) eChemPortal

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not applicable
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.
2 Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
3 Aerosols Not applicable
-
-
- - Not aerosol products.
4 Oxidizing gases Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
5 Gases under pressure Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - A flash point is 125 deg C (closed cup) (GESTIS (Access on July 2017)).
7 Flammable solids Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a chemical group associated with self-reactive properties (epoxides) in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 435 deg C (GESTIS (Access on July 2017)).
10 Pyrophoric solids Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not applicable
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At).
13 Oxidizing liquids Not applicable
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen.
14 Oxidizing solids Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
15 Organic peroxides Not applicable
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on reports of LD50 values for rats of 5,140 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on June 2017)) and 5,800 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012)), it was classified as "Not classified."
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on a report of an LD50 value of > 2,150 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2017)) for rats, it was classified as "Not classified."
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not applicable
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on a report of an LC50 value of 1,220 ppm (8.19 mg/L) (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2017)) in a 4-hour inhalation exposure test with rats, it was classified as "Not classified." Besides, the reference values in the unit of mg/L as mist were applied because the LC50 value is higher than the saturated vapor pressure concentration (56.8 ppm).
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
Based on descriptions that in a skin irritation test with rabbits, the Draize score was 5.2/8, and it was moderately irritating to the skin (PATTY (6th, 2012)), and that it is moderately to severely irritating to the skin in humans (HSDB (Access on June 2017)), it was classified in Category 2. Besides, this substance was classified as "Skin Irrit. 2, H315" in EU CLP classification (ECHA CL Inventory (Access on June 2017)).
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2B
-
Warning
H320 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
Based on a description that in an eye irritation test with rabbits, slight irritation was shown and resolved rapidly (PATTY (6th, 2012)), it was classified in Category 2B. The category was revised based on the information obtained in this investigation.
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
4 Skin sensitization Category 1


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
As for humans, there are descriptions that two out of four laboratory technicians with occupational contact dermatitis were positive in a patch test, and that in patch tests of workers who were regularly exposed to epoxy resins and solvents and have a history of skin pruritus and pharyngeal stenosis, etc., urticarial reactions to this substance were seen 30 minutes after application, and urticarial reactions accompanied by tingling of the pharynx and hoarseness were also observed in the retest (both in HSDB (Access on June 2017)). As for guinea pigs, there is a description that it was a potent skin sensitizer (PATTY (6th, 2012)). From the above, it was classified in Category 1. Besides, this substance was classified as "Skin Sens. 1, H317" in the EU CLP classification (ECHA CL Inventory (Access on June 2017)).
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is a mixture (mixture ratio is unknown) of the isomers (ortho (CAS RN 2210-79-9), meta (CAS RN 2186-25-6), para (CAS RN 2186-24-5)). As for in vivo, gene mutation tests in which the ortho isomer was dermally applied to transgenic mice (MutaTM mice) were negative in cells of the bone marrow, liver, and skin, and micronucleus tests with mouse bone marrow cells were negative (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2017)). As for in vitro, bacterial reverse mutation tests with this substance, the ortho isomer, and the para isomer were all positive (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2017)). From the above, it was classified as "Classification not possible" according to the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government.
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, the details are unknown, but there is a description that toxicity on the reproductive organs and fetuses was observed after inhalation exposure at concentrations lower than the level with a general toxic effect (2.55 mg/m3) (HSDB (Access on June 2017)).
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. There is no data on single exposure to this substance in humans. As for experimental animals, there is a report that in a single oral dose test with rats, although no details of dosages are described, hepatic congestion was observed on necropsy in addition to dyspnea and lacrimation (PATTY (6th, 2012)). Since the LD50 value in this test was reported to be 5,800 mg/kg exceeding Category 2, it is considered that the effect was observed at doses within or above the range for Category 2 near the LD50 value, but a target organ cannot be specified from this information alone. In addition, there are reports that in rats, mice and guinea pigs, as the symptoms of acute toxicity of this substance, central nervous system inhibition, increased respiratory rate, and myasthenia were shown, deaths occurred within 8 days, and liver damage and necrosis of the renal tubular epithelium were observed on necropsy (HSDB (Access on June 2017)). However, there are no descriptions of the exposure route and dosages, and it is insufficient as evidence for the classification. Therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible."
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 1 (respiratory organs)


Danger
H372 P260
P264
P270
P314
P501
No information on humans is available.
As for experimental animals, in a 3-week toxicity test with rats exposed by inhalation (6 hours/day, 5 days/week), inflammation and ulceration of the nasal cavity, decreased feed consumption, suppression of body weight gain, dyspnea, and exophthalmos were observed at or above 53 mg/m3 (0.0088 mg/L) within the guidance value range for Category 1 (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
Therefore, it was classified in Category 1 (respiratory organs).
The classification result was different from the previous classification since a new information source was used.
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Reliable acute toxicity data were not obtained.
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.


NOTE:
* A blank or "-" in a cell of classification denotes that the classification of the hazard class was not conducted.
* Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement will show when hovering the mouse over a code of Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement.
Hazard_statement_and/or_Precautionary_statement are also provided in the Excel file.
* Classification was conducted by relevant Japanese Ministries in accordance with GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government,
and is intended to provide a reference for preparing GHS labelling and SDS for users.
* This is a provisional English translation of classification results and is subject to revision without notice.
* The responsibility for any resulting GHS labelling and SDS referenced from this site is with users.
* Codes assigned to each of the hazard statements and codes for each of the precautionary statement are
based on the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) in United Nations.

To GHS Information