Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 381-73-7 |
Chemical Name | Difluoroacetic acid |
Substance ID | R01-A-022 |
Classification year (FY) | FY2019 |
Ministry who conducted the classification | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE) |
New/Revised | New |
Classification result in other fiscal year | |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
UN GHS document (External link) | UN GHS document |
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Model Label by MHLW (External link) | |
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) | |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | eChemPortal |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | * |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
2 | Flammable gases | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
3 | Aerosols | * |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
4 | Oxidizing gases | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
5 | Gases under pressure | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
6 | Flammable liquids | Category 4 |
Warning |
H227 |
P370+P378
P210 P280 P403 P501 |
It was classified in Category 4 based on a flash point of 78 deg C (closed cup) (GESTIS (Access on October 2019)). |
7 | Flammable solids | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | * |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive or self-reactive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | * |
- |
- | - | No data available. Besides, there is information that it did not catch fire at 37 deg C (970 hPa) (REACH registration dossier (Access on November 2019)). |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | * |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | * |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" because it is estimated that it does not react vigorously with water from information that it is mixable with water (GESTIS (Access on October 2019)). |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | * |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing fluorine and oxygen (but not chlorine) which are chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
14 | Oxidizing solids | * |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
15 | Organic peroxides | * |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
16 | Corrosive to metals | * |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
17 | Desensitized explosives | * |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified." |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Category 1 |
Danger |
H314 |
P301+P330+P331
P303+P361+P353 P305+P351+P338 P304+P340 P260 P264 P280 P310 P321 P363 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), since this substance was a strong acid (pH <= 2), it was classified in Category 1 in accordance with the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government. [Evidence Data] (1) The measured pH value of this substance (1% solution) was 1.28 (24 deg C), which corresponded to a strong acid (pH <= 2) (REACH registration dossier (Access on November 2019)). |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Category 1 |
Danger |
H318 |
P305+P351+P338
P280 P310 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) and (2), since this substance was a strong acid (pH <= 2), it was classified in Category 1 in accordance with the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government. [Evidence Data] (1) The measured pH value of this substance (1% solution) was 1.28 (24 deg C), which corresponded to a strong acid (pH <= 2) (REACH registration dossier (Access on November 2019)). (2) This substance was classified as "Skin corrosion (Category 1)." |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
4 | Skin sensitization | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
6 | Carcinogenicity | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
10 | Aspiration hazard | * |
- |
- | - |
[Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 3 |
- |
H402 |
P273
P501 |
It was classified in Category 3 from 72-hour ErC50 = 62 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2016)). |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 |
P273
P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to no appropriate data on rapid degradability obtained, and 72-hour NOEC = 0.019 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2016)). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 3 due to no appropriate data on rapid degradability obtained, and 48-hour EC50 = 72 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2016)). By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 1. |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
|