GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
Item Information
CAS RN 68439-49-6
Chemical Name Ethoxylated alcohols(C=16-18)
Substance ID R03-A-005-METI, MOE
Classification year (FY) FY2021
Ministry who conducted the classification Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
New/Revised New
Classification result in other fiscal year  
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
UN GHS document (External link) UN GHS document
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) Definitions/Abbreviations
Model Label by MHLW (External link)  
Model SDS by MHLW (External link)  
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) eChemPortal

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products.
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At).
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen.
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule.
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - It is a solid with a melting point of 55 deg C or lower, but the classification is not possible due to no data.
17 Desensitized explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rats (OECD TG 401): > 10,000 mg/kg (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.

[Reference Data, etc.]
(1) LD50 of ethoxylated alcohol (C=10-16) (CAS RN 68002-97-1), which was a mixture containing this substance, in rabbits: > 2,000 mg/kg (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified."
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in an acute dermal irritation/corrosion test (OECD TG 404, occlusive application for 4 hours, observation for 14 days) with rabbits (n=3), erythema was observed but it was fully reversible within 14 days (mean erythema score after 24/48/72h: 0.3, mean edema score after 24/48/72h: 0) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in an acute eye irritation/corrosion test (OECD TG 405, observation for 72 hours) with rabbits (n=6), no eye irritation was observed (cornea opacity score: 0/0/0/0/0/0, iris score: 0/0/0/0/0/0, conjunctivae redness score: 0/0/0/0/0/0, chemosis score: 0/0/0/0/0/0) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in a Buehler test (OECD TG 406, GLP, topical administration: 100% solution) with guinea pigs (n=20), the positive rate was 0% in 24 and 48 hours after challenge (0/20 cases) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) to (3), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) In a bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471, GLP), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
(2) In an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD TG 476, GLP), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
(3) In an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (OECD TG 473, GLP), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified" in the oral route. However, classification was not possible due to lack of data since there was no information on toxicity in the other routes.

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in an acute oral toxicity test (OECD TG 401) with rats, piloerection was observed and no deaths occurred at 10,000 mg/kg (in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) and (2), it was classified as "Not classified" in the oral route. However, classification was not possible due to lack of data since there was no information on toxicity in the other routes.

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents (OECD TG 408) with rats, reversible inflammatory changes in the forestomach were observed at 100 mg/kg/day (within the range for Category 2), and reduced body weight gain (males) and damages to the forestomach and kidneys were observed at 500 mg/kg/day (in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (HERA (2009)).
(2) It was reported that, in a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study with rats dosed by feeding, no adverse effects were observed at 500 mg/kg/day (in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (HERA (2009)).
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available.
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol.


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information