Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 10453-86-8 |
Chemical Name | (5-Benzyl-3-furyl)methyl 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-methylprop-1-en-1-yl)cyclopropanecarboxylate |
Substance ID | m-nite-10453-86-8_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
7 | Flammable solids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Since it was classified into Class 6.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.3349(ICSC, 2001)), it was classified into Not classified. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Although the unsaturated bond is included, it was classified into Not classified, since it was classified into Class 6.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.3349(ICSC, 2001). | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Since it was classified into Class 6.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.3349(ICSC, 2001)), it was classified into Not classified. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The test method applicable for substances becoming liquid or gas at 140degC of test temperature has not been established. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At) are not included. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Although it is an organic compound including oxygen, not fluorine and chlorine, this oxygen has not chemically bound to any elements other than carbon and hydrogen. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The organic compound not including peroxy group in molecule. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H302 | P301+P312 P264 P270 P330 P501 |
There is a description that LD50 values of the oral administration test employing a rat are >5,000 mg/kg, 1,987 mg/kg, 960 mg/kg (EHC 92 (1989)), >2,500 mg/kg, 1,721 mg/kg, 1,244 mg/kg (EHC 92 (1989), HSDB (2001)), and 1,400 mg/kg (HSDB (2001)). Since all definite values corresponded to Category 4, it was classified into Category 4. In addition, in EU classification, it is Xn; R22 (EU-Annex I). | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Since LD50 value of the dermal administration test employing rats was >2,500 mg/kg (EHC 92 (1989)) and >3,000 mg/kg (HSDB (2001)), and LD50 value of the dermal administration test employing rabbits was >2,500 mg/kg (EHC 92 (1989)), it was classified into "Not classified". | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Since it was a solid by the definition of GHS and inhalation in gas was not assumed, it was classified into "Not applicable". | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is written that LC50 value of 4-hour aerosol inhalation exposure test employing rats is >9.49 mg/L, and LC50 value of 1-hour aerosol inhalation exposure test employing rats is >12.0 mg/L (4-hour equivalent: >4.9 mg/L) (EHC 92 (1989)). Since LC50 value was >9.49 mg/L, it was classified into "Not classified". | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Although there is a description, "irritates the skin" in the section of Effects of Short Term Exposure in ICSC (2001), "slight irritant" is described for the skin irritation test using Resmethrin rabbits' ears in EHC 92 (1989) that is the information source for List 1. In addition, there is a description, "There is no skin irritation" (EHC 92 (1989, JMPR (1991))) in the skin irritation test using Bioresmethrin rabbits' ears that are the component of this substance. The "slight irritant" is deemed to correspond to GHS Skin irritation Category 3, but classified into "Not classified", because it is a division not domestically adopted. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Although in the section of the effects of short-term exposure of ICSC (2001), there is a description of "An eye is stimulated," details, such as the level of the stimulus are unknown. Although there is a description of "There is no eyes irritation." in the eye irritation test employing a rabbit (EHC 92 (1989), JMPR (1991)) for Bioresmethrin which is a component of this substance, since there is no data of this substance, classification is not possible due to insufficient data. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible since there is no data. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is a description that "guinea pig did not indicate skin sensitizations" (EHC 92 (1989)). Moreover, for Bioresmethrin which is a component of this substance, although there are descriptions that "skin sensitization was not shown" (JMPR (1991)) and that "a potential sensitization is low only with slight erythema" (EHC 92 (1989), JMPR (1991)) in the sensitization tests with guinea pig, the substance cannot be classified because of insufficient data since it has no other data. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible because there is no data of in vivo examination. In addition, there is a description of "negative" in the reverse mutation test employing Salmonella typhimurium and bacillus coli, chromosome aberration test employing a Chinese hamster cultured cell and mouse bone marrow cells, and the mutation assay employing Chinese hamster V79 cell as in vitro mutagenicity tests (EHC 92 (1989)). | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Since no evaluation by major international evaluation agencies is made and there is no sufficient data, classification is not possible. In addition, there is a description that "carcinogenicity was not foreseen by highest dose, either" in the 85-week oral administration study employing mice and the 112-week oral administration study employing rats (EHC 92 (1989)). | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H361 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
There is a description as follows in NTP DB (Access on November 2008), "There is no reproductive toxicity against animals but data are not available for humans." Moreover, there is a description as follows in EHC 92 (1989), "Teratogenicity was not observed" in the teratogenicity study via oral administration using rats and mice. On the other hand, there is a description as follows in the 3 generation study with mixed food administration using rats, " Statistically apparent increase in the number of low body weight children and still birth was observed"(EHC 92 (1990), IRIS (2002)) but it was classified in Category 2, because the effect of toxicity on parent animals at the same dose level is unknown without reviewing primary documents. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 2 (central nervous system) |
Warning |
H371 | P308+P311 P260 P264 P270 P405 P501 |
There is a description that the animal exposed to Resmethrin "shows nerve tremor, excitement, convulsive muscle contraction, collapse, and coma" as acute symptoms (EHC 92 (1989)). Moreover, when the cited literature of the test data described in HSDB (2001) (Environ.Health Perspect.14 (1976)) was investigated, there were descriptions of "Nerve tremor and ataxia were seen 30 minutes to 3 hours after exposure, sensitive reaction in the oral administration test employing rats and mice of Resmethrin and of "Ataxia and incontinence of urine were seen at the time of high concentration exposure." in 4 hours mist inhalation exposure test for employing rats and mice of , (+)-Trans & Cis-reaction." This substance consists of four sorts of isomer mixtures. In consideration of the degree of the toxicity varying depending on compounding ratio, the central nervous system was considered to be the target organ from these findings. Moreover, since the effect was seen within the range of the guidance value of Category 2, it was classified into Category 2 (central nervous system). In addition, the section of the effect of short term exposures in ICSC (2002) has a description of "The nervous system may be affected" for Cis-resmethrin which is one of the composition ingredients of this substance. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 2 (central nervous system) |
Warning |
H373 | P260 P314 P501 |
It is written in carcinogenicity examination by 2-year oral administration in rats that"hypertrophy of hepatocytes and decrease in lien weight of female rats were found" (IRIS (2002)). Moreover, it is written in EHC 92 (1989) that in 90- day inhalation exposure test in rats that "minute clinical findings and irritating property findings were found in level of exposure 0.3 mg/L, however, histopathology findings by administration were not found in lungs or other organs, and in 112-week oral study in rats that "hypertrophy of hepatocytes was found, however, it was not classified into specific virulence response". In addition, "weight reduction, feed intake reduction, increase in liver weight, and tremulousness were described as common findings in the oral study in a number of rats, it was classified into Category 2 (central nervous systems) because tremor symptoms were found within the scope of the guidance value of Category 2. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
It was classified into Category 1 from 96 hours LC50=0.000275mg/L of the fish (Rainbow Trout) (EHC 92 (1989)). | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
Since acute toxicity was Category 1 and there were no rapid degradability (not readily degradable, the decomposition by BOD: -4% (standard test method (4 weeks)) (Existing Chemical Safety Inspections Data (2007))), it was classified into Category 1. | FY2008 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
|