Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

日本語で表示



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 10461-98-0
Chemical Name 2-cyclohexylidene-2-phenylacetonitrile
Substance ID m-nite-10461-98-0_v2
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link)  
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link)  
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - A flash point was 152.3 deg C (969.0 hPa, closed-cup) (ECHA (Accessed July 2020)). FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a chemical group associated with self-reactive properties (ethylene group) present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 385 deg C (ECHA (Accessed Aug. 2020)). FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
17 Desensitized explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
It was classified in Category 4 from (1).

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rats: 619 mg/kg (OECD TG 401, GLP) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020))

FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
It was classified as "Not classified" from (1).

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rats: > 2,000 mg/kg (OECD TG 402, GLP) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020))

FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified."
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
No dead animals were found at 4.792 mg/L within the range for Category 4 in (1), but because effects at a dose near the upper limit for Category 4 are unclear, the classification is not possible.

[Evidence Data]
(1) LC50 for rats (4 hours): > 4.792 mg/L (OECD TG 403, GLP) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020))
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
It was classified as "Not classified" from (1).

[Evidence Data]
(1) It is reported that in a skin irritation test with rabbits (n = 3) (OECD TG 404, GLP, semi-occlusive, 4-hour application, 72-hour observation), no skin irritation was seen (erythema/eschar score: 0/0/0, edema score: 0/0/0) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
It was classified as "Not classified" from (1).

[Evidence Data]
(1) It is reported that in an eye irritation test with rabbits (n = 3) (OECD TG 405, GLP, 72-hour observation), 2 animals showed slight conjunctival redness at 1 hour after application but fully recovered within 1 day (corneal opacity score: 0/0/0, iritis score: 0/0/0, conjunctival redness score: 0/1/0, chemosis score: 0/0/0) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
It was classified as "Not classified" from (1), (2).

[Evidence Data]
(1) It is reported that in a patch test in 47 persons (occlusive, 24-hour application), no skin sensitization was seen (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
(2) It is reported that in a maximization test with guinea pigs (n = 10) (OECD TG 406, GLP, intradermal administration: 5% solution), a positive rate was 0% after both 24 and 48 hours (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) to (4), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) In an in vivo micronucleus test using the peripheral blood erythrocytes of mice (dosed by gavage), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
(2) In a bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
(3) In an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD TG 476), negative results (mouse lymphoma cells) were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
(4) In a chromosomal aberration test (OECD TG 473), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 3 (Narcotic effects)


Warning
H336 P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
P405
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), since sedation was observed, it was classified in Category 3 (narcotic effects).

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that in an acute oral toxicity test with rats (OECD TG 401, GLP), sedation, dyspnea, ruffled fur, hunched posture, lying on the stomach, and emaciation were observed at and above 500 mg/kg (within the range for Category 2) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(2) It was reported that in an acute dermal toxicity test with rats (OECD TG 402, GLP), no effects were observed at 2,000 mg/kg (within the range for Category 2) (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (systemic)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), since the cause of death and target organ could not be identified, it was classified in Category 2 (systemic toxicity) in accordance with the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government.

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that in a 28-day oral toxicity study with rats dosed by gavage (OECD TG407, GLP), one male and one female died at 200 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 62.2 mg/kg/day, within the range for Category 2), but the cause of death could not be identified; and at the same 200 mg/kg/day, a slight increase of the relative liver weight, increased AST/ALT activities (ALT: a 47% increase in females, AST: a 48% increase in males, a 12% increase in females) and decreased TG (27 to 30% decrease) were observed, but no abnormalities were observed in the histopathological examination (REACH registration dossier (Accessed Aug. 2020)).
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2020 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified in Category 1 from 96-hour LC50 = 0.6 mg/L for fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (REACH registration dossier, 2021). FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
It was classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (a 28-day degradation rate by BOD: 0% (Evaluation information (Evaluation summary sheet) under the Chemical Substances Control Law, METI)) and 21-day NOEC = 0.07 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (REACH registration dossier, 2021). FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information