Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 105-05-5
Chemical Name 1,4-Diethylbenzene
Substance ID m-nite-105-05-5_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
6 Flammable liquids Category 3


Warning
H226 P303+P361+P353
P370+P378
P403+P235
P210
P233
P240
P241
P242
P243
P280
P501
Classified into Category 3 since flash point 56 degC (closed-cup) (Hommel (1996)) is >=23 degC and <=60 degC. The substance is classified into Class 3, PG III in UNRTDG (UN2049). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Auto-ignition point is 430 degC (Lide (88th, 2008)) exceeding 70 degC. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on a LD50 value of >2000 mg/kg for rats ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access in Sep. 2009)), the substance was classified into "Not classified" in JIS Classification (correspond to Category 5 or "Not classified" in GHS classification). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
Based on a result of "moderate irritation and slight necrosis" by application of undiluted substance to rabbits (PATTY (5th, 2001)), the substance was classified into Category 2. As relevant information, there is a report of skin injury from contact as human health effects (HSDB (2003)). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
Diethylbenzene tested by drop on a rabbit eye caused transient symptoms of irritation, but no injury was detected by fluorescein staining (HSDB (2003)). Additionally, it was reported that men exposed to 1000 ppm experienced eye irritation which rapidly diminished in intensity on continued exposure and a concentration of 2000 ppm caused immediately severe eye irritation, lacrimation (HSDB (2003)), and there is a report that diethylbenzene is an eye irritant (HSDB (2003)). Based on these information, the substance was classified into Category 2. [Data for diethylbenzene was used as the basis of classification on the assumption that there are only minor differences between isomers.] FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data from in vivo mutagenicity tests. From in vitro mutagenicity tests, there are reports of a negative Ames test ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access on Sep. 2009)) and a negative Chinese hamster CHL cell chromosomal aberration test ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access on Sep. 2009)). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - In a combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats (OECD TG422), there were no effects on mating, fertility and oestrus cycle and all gestation animals delivered pups normally ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access on Sep. 2009)). Although there was no adverse effect on sexual function and fertility of parental animals, classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data for fetal development including teratogenicity. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - In a rat acute oral toxicity test (OECD TG401 (GLP)), decrease of spontaneous motor activity and lacrimation were observed at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg but no changes in body weight or treatment-related gross pathological changes were observed ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access on Sep. 2009)). Based on this result, the substance corresponds to "Not classified" with oral exposure. However, classification was not possible due to lack of data with other exposure routes (inhalation, dermal). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - In a combined repeat dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity test with rats (OECD TG422 (GLP)), increases in BUN and GPT were observed at 150 mg/kg/day (90-day equivalence: 75 mg/kg/day) and 750 mg/kg/day (90-day equivalence: 375 mg/kg/day), and increases in total protein, albumin, creatinine and total bilirubin were observed at 750 mg/kg/day. As the gross findings, increases in incidence of brown colored livers or enlargement of the livers were observed in male rats receiving 750 mg/kg/day, and swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes was observed histopathologically. Although morphological changes in the liver were observed at a high dose level (90-day equivalence: 375 mg/kg/day) which exceeds the guidance value range, some biochemical changes such as increased enzyme activity were observed at a middle dose level (90-day equivalence: 75 mg/kg/day) which is within the guidance value range. Therefore, classification was not possible due to lack of data for evidence of effects at the upper limit (100 mg/kg/day) of the guidance value range. The above information come from "Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (access on Sep. 2009). For health hazards, refer also to the information of 1,2-diethylbenzene (CAS 135-01-3). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although the substance is a hydrocarbon, classification was not possible since the kinematic viscosity at 40 degC was unknown. FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 2
-
-
H401 P273
P501
Classified into Category 2 from its 96h-LC50 = 1.8 mg/L for fish (Oryzias latipes) (SIDS, 1994). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 2


-
H411 P273
P391
P501
Classified into Category 2 since its acute toxicity is Category 2 and it is not rapidly degradable (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1988). FY2009 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (March, 2009)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information