Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 106-42-3
Chemical Name p-Xylene
Substance ID m-nite-106-42-3_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Flammable liquids Category 3


Warning
H226 P303+P361+P353
P370+P378
P403+P235
P210
P233
P240
P241
P242
P243
P280
P501
Based on a flash point of 25 deg C (closed cup), it was classified in Category 3. Besides, it is classified in Class 3, PG III (UN1307) in UNRTDG. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 528 deg C (HSDB (Access on August 2015)). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on LD50 values for rats of 4,029 mg/kg (EHC 190 (1997)), 3,900-4,030 mg/kg (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)), and 5,000 mg/kg (OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 2001)), this substance was classified as "Not classified" (Category 5 in UN GHS classification). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Category 4


Warning
H332 P304+P340
P261
P271
P312
Based on reports of LC50 values (4 hours) of 4,550 ppm (OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 2001)), 4,740 ppm (EHC 190 (1997)), and approx. 4,800 ppm (females) (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) for rats, this substance was classified in Category 4. Besides, a reference value in the unit of ppm was applied as vapour without mist since the LC50 values were less than 90% of the saturated vapor concentration (8,885 ppm). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
Based on a report that this substance was irritating in a skin irritation test with rabbits exposed to 0.5 ml of this substance for 4 hours (EHC 190 (1997)), this substance was classified in Category 2. Besides, it is reported that erythema, edema, desquamation, and necrosis were observed, and this substance showed a moderate to severe irritation of the skin in tests in which xylene mixtures containing this substance were applied to rabbit skin (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, it was reported that this substance showed a mild irritation of eyes in tests in which xylene mixtures containing this substance were applied to rabbit eyes (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). The data used in the previous classification was based on mixtures, and was therefore not used for classification. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - The substance was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was not possible to classify a substance as "Not classified" according to the revised GHS classification guidance for the Japanese Government. As for in vivo data, a micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of mice dosed intraperitoneally was negative (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), IARC 71 (1999), ATSDR (2007)). As for in vitro data, bacterial reverse mutation tests were negative (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), IARC 71 (1999), ATSDR (2007)). FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - With regard to classifications by other organizations, this isomer alone was classified in A4 by the ACGIH (ACGIH (7th, 2001)), and mixed xylenes were classified in Group 3 by the IARC (IARC Vol. 71 (1999)) and in "I" (Inadequate for an assessment of the carcinogenic potential of xylenes) by the EPA in 2003 (IRIS Summary (Access on August 2015)). As for test data, in a two-year oral administration study in which rats or mice were dosed by gavage at 500 mg/kg/day or at 1,000 mg/kg/day, respectively, with a xylene mixture consisting of 14% this substance (as well as 60% m-xylene, 9% o-xylene, and 17% ethylbenzene), no increase in the incidence of tumors was seen (NTP TR 327 (1986), IARC 71 (1999), IRIS Tox Review (2003), Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)).
From the above, due to insufficient data for this substance alone and based on the classification results by other organizations for mixed xylenes, this substance corresponded to "Classification not possible" for this hazard class both in the case of the substance alone and in the case of a mixture. Besides, the ACGIH classified mixed xylenes and the individual isomers in A4, based on the negative results from the NTP carcinogenicity study (ACGIH (7th, 2001)).
FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Reproductive toxicity Category 2


Warning
H361 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
There was no information on the effects of exposure to this substance alone in humans. It was reported that a group of pregnant women exposed to mixed xylenes showed an increased incidence of spontaneous abortions (odds ratio: 3.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-7.5), but this effect could not be attributed to xylene alone because of simultaneous exposure to other solvents and chemicals (not known whether ethylbenzene was present) (ATSDR (2007)). In addition, a case study of spontaneous abortions among Finnish workers proved by a urinary biomarker test to have been given combined exposure to some organic solvents, did not show a statistically significant increase in the odds ratio associated with exposure to xylene either (ATSDR (2007)).
Meanwhile, in experimental animals, it was stated that in a study in which this substance was administered by gavage to pregnant mice during the organogenesis period, an increased incidence of cleft palate was observed in the fetuses at a dose inducing no maternal toxicity. However, this was an insufficient description found in a lecture summary (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)), and was not mentioned in ATSDR (2007) or ACGIH (7th, 2001). Therefore, it was judged that this data should not be used for the classification (in the previous classification, it was classified in Category 1B based on this result).
As for an inhalation route, it was reported that in a study in which pregnant rats were exposed by inhalation (24 hours/day) to this substance during the organogenesis period, reduced fetal body weights, reduced litter sizes, and extra ribs were observed at a dose (3,000 mg/m3) at which the dams showed reduced food consumption or reduced serum sex hormone levels (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ATSDR (2007)). On the other hand, it is reported that in another study in which pregnant rats were exposed at up to 7,000 mg/m3 for 6 hours/day during the organogenesis period, reduced body weight gains in the dams but no adverse effects in the fetuses were observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ATSDR (2007)). In addition, it is reported that in a study in which pregnant rabbits were exposed by inhalation at up to 1,000 mg/m3 for 24 hours/day during the organogenesis period, mortality and abortion in the dams but no effects in the fetuses were observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ATSDR (2007)).
The Japan Society for Occupational Health (JSOH) classified technical-grade xylene containing ethylbenzene (mixed xylenes) in "reproductive toxicants Group 2," and xylenes containing no ethylbenzene (o-xylene, m-xylene, p-xylene, and mixtures thereof) in "reproductive toxicants Group 3" (Recommendation of Occupational Exposure Limits (2015)).
From the above, while uncertain information exists that by combined exposure to multiple solvents including mixed xylenes, increased spontaneous abortion is a concern in humans, it was not known whether or not ethylbenzene was included, and it was not possible to classify this substance based on the classification result by JSOH. Nevertheless, given that minor effects of fetal toxicity were observed mostly at the doses with maternal toxicity in multiple studies in which experimental animals were exposed by inhalation to this substance alone, and taking into account the result of classification by JSOH (p-xylene not including ethylbenzene was classified in "reproductive toxicants Group 3"), this substance was classified in Category 2 for this hazard class.
FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects)



Danger
Warning
H370
H335
H336
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P321
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
This substance is irritating to the respiratory tract (ACGIH (7th, 2001)). As for human cases, dizziness was observed in four of six volunteers exposed to this substance by inhalation (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2007), EHC 190 (1997)). For experimental animals, it is reported that inhalation exposure (unknown species of animals, and doses corresponding to Category 1) caused incoordination, tremors, reduced axonal transport, and at higher doses, narcotic effects; additionally, while the route(s) of exposure, doses, etc. are not known, tremors, biphasic central nervous system response (depression and excitement), and gastrointestinal-tract damage were reported as toxic symptoms of this substance (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2007), EHC 190 (1997)).
From the above, this substance is irritating to the respiratory tract, affects the central nervous system, and causes narcotic effects, therefore, it was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects).
FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - There was no information on the adverse effects of human exposure to this substance alone. However, with regard to mixtures containing p-xylene, there are reports on effects on the nervous system (headache, anxiety, forgetfulness, insomnia, dysautonomia, inability to concentrate, and muscle weakness), respiratory organs (chest pain, dyspnea, impaired pulmonary function, etc.), and haemal system (anemia, leukopenia, bone marrow hypoplasia, etc.) in humans (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2007)). It is written in a part of the reports that these effects were caused by combined exposure including exposure to other solvents such as benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Therefore, these effects could not be regarded as the effects of exposure to mixed xylenes alone.
Meanwhile, for experimental animals, in a 10-day oral administration study with rats dosed by gavage, increased liver weights were observed at 250 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 27.8 mg/kg/day), but associated findings to suggest hepatic toxicity were not detected in blood chemistry test values, histological changes, etc. (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Therefore, including the description above, there was no data on adverse effects in experimental animals that could be used for the classification of this substance.
From the above, information on both humans and experimental animals were lacking, for classification as the effects by exposure to this substance alone. As with the other isomers, this substance was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data.
FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Aspiration hazard Category 1


Danger
H304 P301+P310
P331
P405
P501
This substance is a hydrocarbon with a calculated kinematic viscosity value of 0.70 mm2sec (25/20 deg C) (viscosity: 0.603 mPa*s (25 deg C); density (specific gravity): 0.861 (20/4 deg C) (HSDB (Access on August 2015))), and was therefore classified in Category 1. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 2
-
-
H401 P273
P501
From 96-hour LC50 =1.7 mg/L for crustacea (Crangon franciscorum), and 96-hour LC50 = 1.7 mg/L for fish (Morone saxatilis) (both Initial Risk Assessment (NITE, CERI, NEDO, 2005), EHC 190, 1997), it was classified in Category 2. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 2


-
H411 P273
P391
P501
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified as "Not classified" from 21-day NOEC = 1.29 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012), Initial Risk Assessment (NITE, CERI, NEDO, 2005)) although being not rapidly degradable (a degradation rate by BOD: 38%, readily biodegradable (Official Bulletin of Ministry of International Trade and Industry, 1975)).
If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to being not rapidly degradable and 96-hour LC50 = 1.7 mg/L for fish (Morone saxatilis) (Initial Risk Assessment (NITE, CERI, NEDO, 2005), EHC 190, 1997).
By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 2.
FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2015 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information