Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 106-51-4
Chemical Name p-benzoquinone; p-Quinone
Substance ID m-nite-106-51-4_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. Besides, there is information that it is combustible (Hommel (1991)). FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive or self-reactive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" because it is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 560 deg C (ICSC (1997)). FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
17 Desensitized explosives Not classified
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 3


Danger
H301 P301+P310
P264
P270
P321
P330
P405
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) and (2), it was classified in Category 3.

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rats: 130 mg/kg (IARC 15 (1977), ACGIH (7th, 2001), PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019))
(2) LD50 for rats: 165 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012))

[Reference Data, etc.]
(3) LD50 for rats: 25-50 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on June 2019))
(4) LD50 for rats: 100 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on June 2019))
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)."
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified in Category 2.

[Evidence Data]
(1) Local cutaneous discoloration, severe irritation, erythema, swelling, and the formation of papules and vesicles were caused by exposure to this substance (ACGIH (7th, 2001), HSDB (Access on June 2019)).
(2) Contact with this substance (solid) produces severe irritation (HSDB (Access on June 2019)).
(3) In an in vitro skin corrosion test with the artificial skin model (EpiDerm) in accordance with OECD TG 431, the survival rates after 3 and 60 minute-exposure were 37% and 76.3%, respectively (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(4) It was classified in "Skin Irrit. 2 (H315)" in the EU-CLP classification (EU CLP classification (Access on July 2019)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified in Category 2.

[Evidence Data]
(1) Exposure to vapours induces serious vision disturbances, and injury extends through the entire conjunctiva and cornea (IARC 71 (1999)).
(2) This substance (solid) and relatively concentrated solutions were very irritating to the eyes (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(3) The vapors of benzoquinone at 0.5 ppm were irritating to the eyes, and at 3.0 ppm were very irritating (HSDB (Access on June 2019)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(4) It was classified in "Eye Irrit. 2 (H319)" in the EU-CLP classification (EU CLP classification (Access on July 2019)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Skin sensitization Category 1A


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified in Category 1A. Besides, the category was changed because new data were obtained.

[Evidence Data]
(1) The positive rate was 100% in a skin sensitization test (maximization method, intradermal concentration 0.005%) with guinea pigs (Basketter et al. (1992), PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(2) In a mouse local lymph node assay, it was positive, and SI values were 36.4 (0.5%), 42.3 (1%), and 52.3 (2.5%) (Basketter et al. (1992), PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(3) In an in vitro skin sensitization test (In Chemico Skin Sensitization: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA)) according to OECD TG 442C, the mean peptide depletion rate (>42.47) associated with high reactivity was obtained (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Category 2


Warning
H341 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on positive results in the in vivo micronucleus tests and the in vitro positive results in the gene mutation test and micronucleus test with cultured mammalian cells in (1) and (2), it was classified in Category 2.

[Evidence Data]
(1) As for in vivo, there were reports that it was negative in a dominant lethal test with mice by intraperitoneal administration and weakly positive in micronucleus tests with mouse bone marrow cells and fetal liver cells by oral administration (IARC 71 (1999), PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(2) As for in vitro, there were reports of negative and positive results in bacterial reverse mutation tests and positive results in a mutation test (hprt locus) and micronucleus tests with cultured mammalian cells (IARC 71 (1999), NTP DB (Access on June 2019)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(3) It was concluded in PATTY (6th, 2012) that the results of in vivo studies indicate that it is weakly positive for genotoxicity in vivo.
(4) In addition to the results of the mouse micronucleus test by oral administration shown in (1), it was reported that a micronucleus test with mice by intraperitoneal administration was negative (IARC 71 (1999)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on the classification results by other organizations in (1), it was classified as "Classification not possible" in accordance with the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government.

[Evidence Data]
(1) As for classification results by domestic and domestic and international organizations, it was classified in Group 3 by IARC (IARC 71 (1999)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(2) This substance was tested for carcinogenicity with mice by skin application (1940) and inhalation (1954) and with rats by subcutaneous injection (1957). However, all of these were insufficient to evaluate the carcinogenicity of this substance (IARC 71 (1999)).
(3) There were reports that this substance did not increase the formation of GGT-positive foci in the liver and that there was no promoter activity in initiator-treated mouse tissues (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation)



Danger
Warning
H370
H335
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P321
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation). The category was changed from the previous classification by the use of the new information sources.

[Evidence Data]
(1) As for experimental animals, although there was no description of the doses, it was reported that administration of large doses of this substance induced local irritation, clonic convulsions, respiratory difficulties, and drop in blood pressure, and death due to paralysis of the medullary centers (IARC 15 (1977)).
(2) It was reported that tremors and convulsions were observed at doses of 50-200 mg/kg, which are equivalent to Category 1, in a single oral administration test with rats (HSDB (Access on June (2019))).
(3) It was described that the vapour of this substance was very irritating and caused coughing and sneezing (PATTY (6th, 2012)).

FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.

[Reference Data, etc.]
(1) There was a report that it was confirmed that no systemic effects arose at a level of 0.1 ppm of the vapor of this substance in workers in plants where this substance and hydroquinone were produced (ACGIH (7th, 2001)).
(2) When rats were exposed by inhalation to concentrations of 2.7-3.6 mg/m3 (estimated to be vapor) (converted guidance value: 0.0018-0.0024 mg/L, within the range of Category 1) for 4 hours/day for 4 months, weight loss, easy tiredness, transient anemia, and thrombopenia were observed (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified in Category 1 from 96-hour LC50 = 0.045 mg/L for fish (Pimephales promelas) (ECETOC TR91, 2003). FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Reliable chronic toxicity data were not obtained.
Due to unknown rapid degradability, it was assumed to be not rapidly degradable. And because it was classified in Category 1 in acute toxicity, it was classified in Category 1.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information