Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 107-11-9 |
Chemical Name | 3-Amino-1-propene; Allylamine |
Substance ID | m-nite-107-11-9_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Category 2 |
Danger |
H225 | P303+P361+P353 P370+P378 P403+P235 P210 P233 P240 P241 P242 P243 P280 P501 |
It was classified in Category 2 based on a flash point of -29 deg C (closed cup) and a boiling point of 52-53 deg C (Hommel (1991)). | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
7 | Flammable solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is a chemical group associated with self-reactive properties (unsaturated bond) present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" because it is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 370 deg C (Hommel (1991)). | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to low-temperature-boiling liquids are not available. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | Not classified |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 3 |
Danger |
H301 | P301+P310 P264 P270 P321 P330 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) and (2), it was classified in Category 3. [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rats: 102 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)) (2) LD50 for rats: 106 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on June 2019)) |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Category 1 |
Danger |
H310 | P302+P352 P361+P364 P262 P264 P270 P280 P310 P321 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Base on (1), it was classified in Category 1. [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rabbits: 35 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)) |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Category 2 |
Danger |
H330 | P304+P340 P403+P233 P260 P271 P284 P310 P320 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified in Category 2. Besides, LC50 values were lower than 90% of the saturated vapor concentration (318,446 ppm), therefore, the reference value in units of ppm was applied as vapour with little mist. [Evidence Data] (1) LC50 for rats (4 hours): 286 ppm (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)) [Reference Data, etc.] (2) LC50 for rats (8 hours): 177 ppm (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 250.32 ppm) (PATTY (6th, 2012)) |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Category 1 |
Danger |
H314 | P301+P330+P331 P303+P361+P353 P305+P351+P338 P304+P340 P260 P264 P280 P310 P321 P363 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified in Category 1. Besides, since new data were obtained, the category was changed. [Evidence Data] (1) In an in vitro skin corrosion test using an artificial skin model (EpiDerm) in accordance with OECD TG 431, after 3 or 60 minutes of exposure, the viability was 12.8% or 8.4%, respectively (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)). [Reference Data, etc.] (2) This substance is a severe eye and skin irritant (PATTY (6th, 2012)). (3) This substance is a severe skin and eye irritant in humans (HSDB (Access on June 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Category 1 |
Danger |
H318 | P305+P351+P338 P280 P310 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on data of (1)-(4) and the fact that it was judged to be skin corrosive (Category 1), it was classified in Category 1. Besides, since detailed data was obtained, the category was changed. [Evidence Data] (1) This substance is a severe eye and skin irritant (PATTY (6th, 2012)). (2) This substance is a severe skin and eye irritant in humans (HSDB (Access on June 2019)). (3) There is a report that in an eye irritation test with rabbits, equivalent or similar to OECD TG 405 (applied with 0.05 mL), it was highly irritating (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)). (4) In an in vitro skin corrosion test using an artificial skin model (EpiDerm) in accordance with OECD TG 431, it was judged to be a corrosive substance (Category 1) (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)). [Reference Data, etc.] (5) In the case of accidental exposure to the vapors of this substance, transient irritation to the mucous membranes of the nose, eyes and mouth occurred, resulting in lacrimation, coryza and sneezing (PATTY (6th, 2012)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] There are no in vivo data. Therefore, classification was not possible due to lack of data. [Evidence Data] (1) As for in vitro, there is a negative result in a bacterial reverse mutation test (NTP DB (Access on June 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Although no reproductive toxicity was observed in (1), this test is a screening test and there are no data from developmental toxicity tests, therefore, classification is not possible due to lack of data. [Evidence Data] (1) In a reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with rats exposed by inhalation (OECD TG 421), no reproductive toxicity was observed at concentrations where parental toxicity (underactivity, piloerection, hunched posture and decreased body weight gain) was observed (REACH registration dossier (Access on July 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 1 (cardiovascular system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation) |
Danger Warning |
H370 H335 |
P308+P311 P260 P264 P270 P321 P405 P501 P304+P340 P403+P233 P261 P271 P312 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on human exposure cases in (1)-(3) and the results in rats in (4), it was classified in Category 1 (cardiovascular system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation). Although the lung was included as a target organ in the previous classification, the original source was listed in List 3 and there is no other supporting information, therefore, the classification result was changed. [Evidence Data] (1) Mucous membrane irritation and chest discomfort occurred in some persons after inhalation of this substance at 2.5 ppm (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)). (2) Inhalation of the vapors of this substance at 14 ppm caused intolerable irritation of the eyes and respiratory tract in humans (HSDB (Access on June 2019)). (3) Researchers (several) exposed to the vapor (concentration unknown) of this substance by an accident experienced transient irritation of the mucous membranes of the nose, eyes, and mouth, with lacrimation, coryza, and sneezing (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)). (4) In a single inhalation exposure test with rats, perivascular edema and cellular infiltration were observed in the heart after 4-hour exposure at 100 ppm (corresponding to Category 1), and an obvious myocardial lesion was confirmed in one animal (NRC Committee on AEGL (2007)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 1 (cardiovascular system) |
Danger |
H372 | P260 P264 P270 P314 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), effects on the cardiac muscle and blood vessels were observed after oral administration to rats, therefore, it was classified in Category 1 (cardiovascular system). Since information sources were reviewed, the classification result was changed from the previous classification. [Evidence Data] (1) In a study in which male rats were administered 0.005 to 0.1% of this substance in drinking water for 21-104 days, it caused dose-dependent myocardial and vascular lesions, and after three weeks of treatment (converted guidance value: 1.5-29 mg/kg/day, within the range of Category 1-Category 2), severe myocardial fibrosis was developed (PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on June 2019)). [Reference Data, etc.] (2) In a study in which localized arteritis was observed following intradermal injection of this substance, cardiotoxicity was reported (PATTY (6th, 2012)). (3) Allylamines are known to be cardiotoxins. They can cause acute myocardial necrosis that is cumulative with repeated administrations, as well as vascular proliferative lesions after several weeks of treatment (PATTY (6th, 2012)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, although there is information of (1), no other information is available to provide the evidence of the classification, therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data. [Reference Data, etc.] (1) Although there is a possibility of pneumonia due to aspiration in humans (SITTIG (6th, 2012)), no other information is available to provide the evidence of the classification, therefore, classification is not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 2 |
- |
H401 | P273 P501 |
It was classified in Category 2 from 48-hour LC50 = 35.9 mg/L [geometric average, N = 10] for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (EPA AQUIRE: 2018, Canton, J. H. et al. (1978)). | FY2018 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Chronic toxicity data were not obtained. Although appropriate data on rapid degradability were not obtained, it was classified as "Not classified" due to no bioaccumulation (LogKow: 0.03 (PHYSPROP Database: 2018)). | FY2018 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2018 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
|