Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 128639-02-1 |
Chemical Name | Carfentrazone-ethyl |
Substance ID | m-nite-128639-02-1_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" from a flash point of 299 deg C (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
7 | Flammable solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive or self-reactive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen, fluorine, and chlorine, which are chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | Not classified |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified." | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) and (2), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rats: 5,143 mg/kg (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)) (2) LD50 for rats: > 5,000 mg/kg (EPA Pesticide (1998)) |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rats: > 4,000 mg/kg (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)) |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Liquid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified." Besides, since the LC50 value was higher than the saturated vapor concentration (0.000158 ppm), the reference value in units of mg/L was applied as a mist. [Evidence Data] (1) LC50 (4 hours) for rats: 5.09 mg/L (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) This substance was not irritating to the rabbit skin (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) This substance was minimally irritating to the rabbit eye (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) This substance was minimally irritating to the rabbit eye, however, it was nonirritating and nonsensitizing to the rabbit skin (ACGIH (7th, 2018), HSDB (Access on July 2019)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) and (2), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) As for in vivo, there are reports that it was negative in an erythrocyte micronucleus test and a hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis test following intraperitoneal doses to mice (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (2) As for in vitro, there are reports that it was negative in a bacterial reverse mutation test and a chromosomal aberration test with cultured mammalian cells (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on the recent classification results by other organizations in (1), it was classified as "Classification not possible" in accordance with GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government. [Evidence Data] (1) According to existing classification results by domestic and international organizations, this substance was classified in A4 by ACGIH (ACGIH (7th, 2018)), and as NL (Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans) by EPA (EPA Annual Cancer Report (2018): Classified in 2001). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1)-(3), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) In a 2-generation reproductive toxicity test with rats, reduced body weight gain was observed in parental animals of both generations, however, no reproductive toxicity was seen (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (2) In a developmental toxicity test by oral administration of this substance to female rats from gestation Days 6 through 15, wavy and thickened ribs of fetuses were observed at the dose of maternal toxicity (urogenital staining) (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). Besides, effects on fetuses were thought to be skeletal variations. Effects on maternal animals were observed at or above 600 mg/kg/day, on the other hand, effects on fetuses were observed at 1,240 mg/kg/day, therefore, these results were determined as not evidence of classification. (3) In a developmental toxicity test by oral administration of this substance to female rabbits from gestation Days 6 through 19, no effects on maternal animals or fetuses were observed (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 2 (liver) |
Warning |
H373 | P260 P314 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified in Category 2 (liver). [Evidence Data] (1) In a 2-year combined repeated dose toxicity/carcinogenicity test with rats by feeding, increases in total urinary porphyrins and liver toxicity were reported at or above doses within the range for Category 2 (male: 37 mg/kg/day, female: 12 mg/kg/day) (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (2) In a feeding carcinogenicity test with mice, increased mortality and hepatocellular damage were reported at doses within or above the range for Category 2 (male: 100 mg/kg/day, female: 119 mg/kg/day) (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). [Reference Data, etc.] (3) In a 1-year feeding repeated dose toxicity test with dogs, an increase in urinary porphyrins at a dose of 150 mg/kg/day (exceeding the range for Category 2) is reported (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (4) In a 90-day feeding repeated dose toxicity test with mice, liver pathology was reported at or above 1,143 mg/kg/day (exceeding the range for Category 2) (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (5) In a 90-day feeding repeated dose toxicity test with rats, decreased rates of body weight gain, reductions in food consumption and histopathologic changes in the liver at doses exceeding the range for Category 2 (male: 470 mg/kg/day, female: 578 mg/kg/day) were reported (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). (6) In a 90-day feeding repeated dose toxicity test with dogs, a decreased rate of body weight gain in females and an increase in urinary porphyrins in both sexes were reported at or above 150 mg/kg/day (exceeding the range for Category 2) (ACGIH (7th, 2018)). |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 72-hour ErC50 = 0.0139 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2014). | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (BIOWIN), and 72-hour NOECr = 0.00497 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2014). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to being not rapidly degradable (BIOWIN), and 96-hour LC50 = 3.29 mg/L for fish (Cyprinus carpio) (Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2014). By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 1. |
FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. | FY2019 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1)) |
|