Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 13048-33-4
Chemical Name Hexane-1,6-diyl diacrylate
Substance ID m-nite-13048-33-4_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Since the flash point by OSHA(2004) is 132degC(Cleveland Open-cup Tester), it was classified into Not classified. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although the unsaturated bond is included in chemical structure, classification is not possible with no data. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Even if it contacts the normal temperature air, it does not ignite spontaneously (ignition point 235degC (OSHA, 2004)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - The test method suitable for liquid substances is not established. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At) are not included. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Although it is an organic compound including oxygen, not fluorine and chlorine, this oxygen has not chemically bound to any elements other than carbon and hydrogen. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The organic compound not including peroxy group in molecule. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Although LD50 value 5,000 mg/kg of the oral administration test employing a rat (HSDB (2004)) corresponded to the U.N. GHS acute toxicity Category 5, it fell under unadopted category in Japan and was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Although LD50 value with 3,600 mg/kg (HSDB (2004)) of the dermal administration test employing rats corresponds to the U.N. GHS acute toxicity Category 5, it was classified into "Not classified" since it was rejected classification at home. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Since it was a solid by the definition of GHS and inhalation in gas was not assumed, it was classified into "Not applicable". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although it has been described that there is a possibility of irritant dermatitis in humans (HSDB (2004)), the expression time of the symptom is unknown. Moreover, although "severe" irritation with a 24-hour application in rabbits (RTECS (2003)) has been described, irritation with a 4-hour application is unknown. Therefore, classification is not possible. European Union classification Xi; R36/ 38 (EU-Annex I) are equivalent to Category 2. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although EU classification Xi; R36/38 (EU-Annex I) is equivalent to Category 2, since there is no other information, classification is not possible. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible since there is no data. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Skin sensitization Category 1


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
It was classified as Category 1 from description that it was a German MAK list Sensitisation substance (Sh) (ACGIH-TLV/BEI (2005)), and allergic dermatitis among the printing industry workers and sensitizing potential at the resin paint factory were observed through a cotact to this substance (HSDB (2004)). It can be classified as R43 (EU-AnnexI) in the EU classification, which is equivalent to Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although it is negative in the genotoxicity test employing in vitro bacteria (NTP DB (Access on September 2008)), classification is not possible because there is no data of in vivo examination. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Since no evaluation by major international evaluation agencies is made, classification is not possible. In addition, the test administered 50 mg of this article to the skin of mouse for 80 weeks (it is 2 times per week) showed that fibrosarcoma was seen in one out of 50 animals, and it is described that a rate is very small compared with positive control group (HSDB (2004)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although in an oral administration study in 6-15 day pregnant rats irritation or white parts in the stomach were observed at doses of 500 mg/kg and urinary stain, rough hair coat, salivation etc. were observed at doses of 1,000 mg/kg in mother animals, no abnormalities were observed in the ovaria or uterus. (HSDB (2004)). Furthermore, in an oral administration study in 6-15 day pregnant rats there is a report of a minimum toxicity value of 7,500 mg/kg (RTECS (2003)), and the effects are at doses far above 1,000 mg/kg. However, since there is no data in the information sources in List 1, classification is not possible. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although it is described that low molecular weight acrylic ester has mucosa irritation (HSDB (2004)), since it is unknown whether this substance is included or not, classification is not possible. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although it is reported (HSDB (2004)) that congestion of the lungs, bleeding and cloudy swelling of the liver and kidney were observed in laboratory animals when it was administered as acrylic ester, the dosing period and dosage are unknown and the test substance cannot be identified as the substance under discussion, so classification is not possible. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified into Category 1 from 96 hours LC50=0.38mg/L of the fish (Oryzias Latipes) (Environmental Agency eco-toxicity tests of chemicals (1998)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Since acute toxicity was Category 1 and there were no data about rapid degradability, it was classified into Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information