NITE - Chemical Management Field

Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

GENERAL INFORMATION

Item	Information
CAS RN	1317-38-0
Chemical Name	Copper(II) oxide
Substance ID	m-nite-1317-38-0_v1
Download of Excel format	Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION

Item	Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link)	To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link)	To UN GHS document
FAQ（GHS classification results by the Japanese Government）	To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file)	List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations	Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link)	MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link)	MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link)	To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS

Hazard class		Classification	Pictogram Signal word	Hazard statement (code)	Precautionary statement (code)	Rationale for the classification	Classification year (FY)	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1	Explosives	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2	Flammable gases	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3	Aerosols	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Not aerosol products.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4	Oxidizing gases	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5	Gases under pressure	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6	Flammable liquids	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7	Flammable solids	Not classified	- -	-	-	It is not combustible (GESTIS (Access on August 2016)).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8	Self-reactive substances and mixtures	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9	Pyrophoric liquids	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10	Pyrophoric solids	Not classified	- -	-	-	It is not combustible (GESTIS (Access on August 2016)).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11	Self-heating substances and mixtures	Not classified	- -	-	-	It is not combustible (GESTIS (Access on August 2016)).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12	Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases	Not classified	- -	-	-	It is estimated that it does not react vigorously with water due to the observation result of being insoluble in water (Merck (15th, 2013)).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
13	Oxidizing liquids	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
14	Oxidizing solids	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	The substance is an inorganic compound containing oxygen, but the classification is not possible due to no data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
15	Organic peroxides	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	It is an inorganic compound.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
16	Corrosive to metals	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
17	Desensitized explosives	-	- -	-	-	-	-	-

HEALTH HAZARDS

Hazard class		Classification	Pictogram Signal word	Hazard statement (code)	Precautionary statement (code)	Rationale for the classification	Classification year (FY)	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1	Acute toxicity (Oral)	Not classified	- -	-	-	Based on the report of an LD50 value (OECD TG 423) of >2,000 mg/kg (SIAP (2014)) for rats, this substance was classified as "Not classified."	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1	Acute toxicity (Dermal)	Not classified	- -	-	-	Based on the report on an LD50 value (OECD TG 402) of >2,000 mg/kg (SIAP (2014)) for rats, this substance was classified as "Not classified."	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1	Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases)	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition)	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1	Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours)	Not classified (Not applicable)	- -	-	-	Solid (GHS definition)	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1	Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists)	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, an LC50 value of >2.08 mg/L (EPA RED (2006)) for rats has been reported, but classification is not possible due to unknown exposure time.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2	Skin corrosion/irritation	Not classified	- -	-	-	Mild irritation (PI Index 1.49) was observed in a rabbit skin irritation test (EPA RED (2009)), so this substance was considered to be "Not classified" (Category 3 in UN GHS classification). Also, it is reported that in a skin irritation test (OECD TG 404) using rabbits, it is not irritating (SIAP (2014)). Therefore, this substance was classified as "Not classified" (Category 3 in UN GHS classification).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3	Serious eye damage/eye irritation	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data. Additionally, in an eye irritation test using rabbits, although the details are unknown, there is a description that irritation was observed but resolved after 7 days (EPA RED (2009)). On the other hand, irritation was not observed in an eye irritation test (OECD TG 405) using rabbits (SIAP (2014)). Since conflicting data exists, this substance was classified as "Classification not possible."	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4	Respiratory sensitization	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4	Skin sensitization	Category 1A	Warning	H317	P302+P352 P333+P313 P362+P364 P261 P272 P280 P321 P501	According to the Recommendation of Occupational Exposure Limits (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 2016), copper and copper compounds are designated as Group 2 of occupational skin sensitizer, so this substance was classified in Category 1A. Additionally, a negative (no reaction at 48 hours after challenge) was reported in a skin sensitization test (OECD TG 406, maximization test) using guinea pigs (SIAP (2014)), and a negative was also reported in a skin sensitization test using guinea pigs (EPA RED (2009)), but it was not adopted as the evidence of the classification because the details are unknown.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5	Germ cell mutagenicity	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6	Carcinogenicity	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7	Reproductive toxicity	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8	Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure	Category 1 (systemic), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation)	Danger Warning	H370 H335	P308+P311 P260 P264 P270 P321 P405 P501 P304+P340 P403+P233 P261 P271 P312	It is described that, in humans, inhalation of fine dust particles of this substance can result in sneezing, coughing, digestive disorders and fever (DFGOT vol. 22 (2004)). It is also reported that metal fume fever accompanied with high fever, shivering, headaches, dryness in the mouth and throat, dysgeusia, nausea, shortness of breath, and myalgia occurred by acute inhalation exposure to copper fumes during the process of welding copper (DFGOT Vol. 22 (2004), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.13 (Ministry of the Environment, 2015), HSDB (Access on September 2016)). This substance may also be contained in copper fumes. From the above, this substance was classified in Category 1 (systemic toxicity), and in Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9	Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data. 　Additionally, in humans, according to health examination records (between 1970 and 1973) of workers (75 to 100 people) who engaged in the grinding and sieving processes of high purity copper at a copper smelting plant, 39 to 70% of the workers showed hepatomegaly, 10 to 15 % showed digestive disorders and 16% showed sexual impotence. It was reported that the copper concentration in the workplace ranged from 464 mg/m3 in 1971 to 111 mg/m3 in 1973. Using normal levels (0.8 - 1.2 mg/L) based on serum levels of copper (0.76-1.17 mg/L) in unexposed workers, it is reported that a rate of workers whose levels exceeded the normal ones increased from 40% to 92% in 1970-1973 (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.13 (Ministry of the Environment, 2015), DFGOT Vol. 22 (2004), EHC 200 (1998)). However, it is described that since there is neither control group nor the description on methods for measuring exposure concentration, severely limit the usefulness (EHC 200 (1998)). Also as for experimental animals, although details are unknown, it was reported in a Russian report that, in a study using male rats exposed to copper oxide aerosol by inhalation for 90 to 100 days, decreases in hemoglobin concentration and serum protein concentration, testicular relative weight, sperm motility rate, and sperm viability were observed in the groups of 0.01 mg/m3 or above, and significant increases in red blood cell count were observed in the groups of 0.1 mg/m3 or above (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.13 (Ministry of the Environment, 2015)).	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10	Aspiration hazard	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	Classification not possible due to lack of data.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS

Hazard class		Classification	Pictogram Signal word	Hazard statement (code)	Precautionary statement (code)	Rationale for the classification	Classification year (FY)	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11	Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute)	Category 1	Warning	H400	P273 P391 P501	From LC50 (unknown time) = 3.1 ppb for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (U.S. EPA: RED, 2009), it was classified in Category 1.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11	Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic)	Category 1	Warning	H410	P273 P391 P501	Although environmental dynamics of the inorganic compound is unknown, due to NOEC (unknown time) = 0.2 ppb for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (US EPA: RED, 2009), it was classified in Category 1.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12	Hazardous to the ozone layer	Classification not possible	- -	-	-	No data available.	FY2016	GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

NOTE:

GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information