Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 17796-82-6
Chemical Name N-(Cyclohexan-1-ylsulfanyl)phthalimide
Substance ID m-nite-17796-82-6_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive or self-reactive properties present in the molecule. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - The test method applicable for substances becoming liquid or gas at 140degC of test temperature has not been established. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At) are not included. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Although it is an organic compound including oxygen, not fluorine and chlorine, this oxygen has not chemically bound to any elements other than carbon and hydrogen. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The organic compound not including peroxy group in molecule. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Although there are descriptions of LD50 value 2,600 mg/kg (IUCLID and (2000)), HSDB (2005), and 4,600 mg/kg, 8,200 mg/kg (IUCLID (2000)), etc., of the oral administration test employing a rat and the minimum value of 2,600 mg/kg corresponded to the U.N. GHS acute toxicity category 5, they fell under unadopted category in Japan and were classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - From a description of LD50 value of >5,010 mg/kg (IUCLID (2000), HSDB (2005)), >2,510 mg/kg, and >7,940 mg/kg (IUCLID (2000)) in the dermal administration test employing rabbits, it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Since it was a solid by the definition of GHS and inhalation in gas was not assumed, it was classified into "Not applicable". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - Since there are descriptions, "not irritating, PII:1.7/8" (IUCLID (2000)) and "not irritating, PII:1.2/8" (IUCLID (2000)) in the Draize test with rabbits, it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
Although there are descriptions of "irritating, Draize score: 48/110" (IUCLID (2000)), "irritating, Draize score: 35/110" (IUCLID (2000)), "Mildly irritating. Draize score: 22.3-24.6/110" (HSDB (2005)), and of "not irritating" (IUCLID (2000)) in the Draize test employing rabbits, since there was much data equivalent to Category 2, it was classified into Category 2. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible since there is no data. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Skin sensitization Category 1


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
It was classified as Category 1 from descriptions of "sensitizing" in the human patch tests (IUCLID (2000)), and that "allergic reaction to humans was observed" (HSDB (2005)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - Since there are descriptions that the body cell in vivo mutagenicity test (chromosome aberration test employing a rat) was "negative" (HSDB (2005)), and in vitro mutagenicity test (the Ames examination, mouse lymphoma assay employing a Salmonella typhimurium) was "negative" (IUCLID (2000), HSDB (2005)), it classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible due to insufficiency of data, because evaluation by major international evaluation institutions has not been performed. Incidentally, there is a description of 24 months mixed-food study in HSDB (PRL Protocol, GLP) using rats , and when the cited literature was reviewed, a description was found as follows, " It will not cause carcinogenicity actions against human health."(USCh (2003)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Reproductive toxicity Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the fact that no reproductive toxicity was found (IUCLID (2000), HSDB (2005)) in the 2 generation reproductive toxicity study (Bio/dynamics Laboratory method, GLP) and teratogenicity was not observed at the dose level (IUCLID (2000)) where the body weight reduction was found among mother animals in the teratogenicity study using rabbits (Bio/dynamics Laboratory method, GLP), it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Not classified
-
-
- - From the description of "Although hypoactivity and the appetite loss were seen in clinical observation, all organs were normal as a result of necropsy" in the test at up to dose 3,160 mg/kg in the oral administration test employing rats (HSDB (2005)), .it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (lung)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
When checking the cited reference (USCh (2003)) in 28-day oral administration test in rats (PRL Protocol, GLP) (IUCLID (2000), HSDB (2005)), it is written in the scope of the guidance value of Category 2 that" weight loss was found, however, it had no effects on blood finding, organ weight, and autopsy results". On the other hand, since "the Rassel sound of lungs and the disseminated granuloma"(HSDB (2005))) were found within the scope of the guidance value of Category 2 in 90- day inhalation exposure test in rats (Bio/dynamics Protocol, GLP), it was classified into Category 2 ( lungs ). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified into Category 1 from 96 hours EC50=0.41mg/L of the fish (Rainbow Trout) (IUCLID (2004)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Since acute toxicity was Category 1 and there were no rapid degradability (BIOWIN7), it was classified into Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information