Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 280-57-9
Chemical Name Triethylenediamine
Substance ID m-nite-280-57-9_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - Since its autoignition temperature is 350 degC (GESTIS (Access on Oct. 2010)), it is considered that the substance does not ignite at room temperature. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
Among four data of the rat LD50 values (700, 1070, 1870 and 2260 mg/kg bw) (SIDS (2005)), three data corresponded to Category 4, and the other one corresponded to "Not classified" in the JIS classification (corresponding to Category 5 in the UN-GHS classification). The substance was classified as Category 4, having the greatest number of data. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the report that the rabbit LD50 value was > 3200 mg/kg bw (SIDS (2005)) and no death was observed, the substance was classified as "Not classified". FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Not classified
-
-
- - Exposure at the saturated vapor pressure concentration (4.48 mL/L) /8hrs (converted value as that of 4-hour exposure: 8.96 mL/L) to rats caused no mortality (LC50: > 8.96 mL/L/4hrs) (SIDS (2005)). And in another study in rats, exposure at 20.2 mL/L/1h (converted value as that of 4-hour exposure: 5.05 mL/L) caused no mortality (LC50: > 5.05 mL/L/4hrs) (SIDS (2005)). Both test concentrations corresponded to "Not classified". The test concentration was higher than the saturated vapor pressure concentration (4.48 mL/L), the criterion values for dust/mist were adopted. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the document that the primary dermal irritation index (PDII) was 4.05 in the rabbit Draize test (SIDS (2005)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the document that PIS (primary irritation score) was 7.1/13 in the rabbit test (OECD TG 405, GLP-compliant) (SIDS (2005)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - The substance was classified as "Not classified" based on the document that non sensitization were reported in two guinea pig maximization tests (OECD TG 406, GLP-compliant) (SIDS(2005)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - The classification was concluded as "Not classified" based on the negative results in the mouse micronucleus test (in vivo mutagenicity test) (SIDS (2005)). As relevant information, as for in vitro study, negative results in the Ames test were reported (SIDS (2005)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Reproductive toxicity Category 2


Warning
H361 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
In the combined repeated dose oral toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity study in rats (OECD TG 422, GLP-compliant), increased resorption, decreased live litter size, decreased postnatal pup survival and decreased pup body weights were observed in the high dose group that cause significant general toxicity in male and female parental animals (SIDS (2005)). Therefore, the substance was classified as Category 2. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (central nervous system)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
In the acute oral toxicity study in rats, administration at the dose levels of 1000 - 1500 mg/kg (equivalent to Category 2 of the guidance values) caused hypoactivity and ruffled coat, and the rats became semi-comatose to comatose within two hours, then some died and the remaining animals returned to normal within one to three hours. Gross necropsy revealed nothing remarkable (SIDS (2005)). Based on the information, the substance was classified as Category 2 (central nervous system). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 1 (upper respiratory tract)


Danger
H372 P260
P264
P270
P314
P501
In the inhalation study in rats exposed for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks (OECD TG 412, GLP-compliant), minimal to moderate chronic laryngitis was noted in the analytical dose levels of 0.06 and 0.41 mg/L, corresponding to Category 1 of the guidance values (converted values as that of 90-day study: 0.02 and 0.14 mg/L) (SIDS (2005)). Based on the information, the substance was classified as Category 1 (upper respiratory system). In addition, severe acute necrotizing laryngitis was observed in the dead females. In the combined repeated dose oral toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in rats for 28 days (OECD TG 422, 2 studies in compliance with GLP), the effects on the kidneys (inflammatory and/or proliferative lesions, acute pyelitis) or on the urinary bladder were found at the dose over the range of Category 2 (1000 mg/kg/day, converted dose level as that of 90-day study: 333 mg/kg/day) (SIDS (2005)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Not classified
-
-
- - Classified as "Not classified" from its 96h-LC50 = 1,730 mg/L for fish (Pimephales promelas) (AQUIRE, 2011). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Not classified
-
-
- - Classified as "Not classified" since its acute toxicity is "Not Classified" and it is not non-water soluble (water solubility = 450 mg/L (PHYSPROP Database, 2011)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information