Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 3048-65-5 |
Chemical Name | 3a,4,7,7a-Tetrahydro-1H-indene |
Substance ID | m-nite-3048-65-5_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Category 3 |
Warning |
H226 | P303+P361+P353 P370+P378 P403+P235 P210 P233 P240 P241 P242 P243 P280 P501 |
Although measurement method of the flash point 38 degC (unknown) (Chemical Risk Information Platform (CHRIP) (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. MSDS) (Access on Jan. 2011)) is unknown, it is estimated that the flash point measured by the closed-cup method fall within the range of >= 23 degC and <= 60 degC. Therefore the substance was classified into Category 3. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Flammable solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Since its autoignition temperature is 370 degC (Chemical Risk Information Platform (CHRIP) (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. MSDS) (Access on Jan. 2011)), it is considered that the substance does not ignite at room temperature. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Based on the rat study (OECD TG 423) that administration of 2000 mg/kg caused no death and 5000 mg/kg was estimated to be the lethal dose ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals"(Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)), the substance was classified as "Not classified". | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Insufficient data were available. Although the rabbit LD50 value of 14.1 mL/kg (converted value as the actual amount of the test substance: 13.1 g/kg) was reported in the "List 3" information source (RTECS (2004)) designated in the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government, details were unknown. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The classification was not possible due to lack of in vivo test data. As relevant information, as for in vitro studies, negative results in the Ames test (OECD TG471, GLP-compliant) ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals"(Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)) and positive results in the chromosome aberration test using Chinese hamster cultured cells (CHL/IU) (OECD TG473, GLP-compliance) ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals"(Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)) were reported. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H361 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
In the combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in rats (OECD TG 422, GLP-compliant) (dose levels: 0, 67, 200 and 600 mg/kg/day), effect on reproductive performance of male animals was not observed even at 600 mg/kg group, whereas in females, reduction of the number of corpora lutea of pregnancy was observed at 600 mg/kg, which was considered to cause prolonged gestation length and reduction of implantation number observed at the same dose. For the next generation, numbers of pups born and those born alive were decreased at the 600 mg/kg group ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals"(Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)). In addition, decreased body weight gain was seen in male and female rats at 200 and 600 mg/kg groups ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals"(Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)). The reproductive toxicity was observed at the dose levels, causing general toxicity to parent animals. Therefore, the substance was classified as Category 2. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | In the acute oral toxicity study in rats (OECD TG423), no deaths occurred at the dose levels of 300 and 2000 mg/kg, and slightly decreased locomotor activity and ptosis, rough hair, transient salivation and/or reddish tear were observed as the changes in the general conditions at 2000 mg/kg, but all of these disappeared on the following day. No macroscopic changes of the internal organs were observed in both 300 and 2000 mg/kg groups at necropsy ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)). Based on the information, although "Not classified" was applicable for oral route, the classification was not possible due to lack of information on the effects via the dermal and inhalation routes. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | In the combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in rats (OECD TG 422, GLP-compliant) (dose levels: 0, 67, 200 and 600 mg/kg/day), slight to moderate hyaline droplet deposition and occurrence of eosinophilic bodies in the epithelium of proximal tubules of the kidneys were observed in male groups at 67 mg/kg/day (converted value as that of 90-day study: approx. 33 mg/kg/day) or more, and trend to increase of rate of slight regeneration in the renal tubules was additionally observed at 200 mg/kg/day (converted value as that of 90-day study: approx. 100 mg/kg/day) or more. However, since it was reported that these changes were considered as specific phenomenon of male rats with no toxicological significance ("Toxicity Testing Reports of Environmental Chemicals" (Chemicals Investigation Promoting Council) (Access on Jan. 2011)), they were not evidenced to classify. Furthermore, the changes seen at 200 mg/kg/day (converted value as that of 90-day study: approx. 100 mg/kg/day) were suppression in body weight gain in both sexes and increases in weights of both the liver and kidneys in males or females without any other treatment-related changes containing histopathological changes. Thus, "Not classified" was applicable for oral route, but the effects were unknown in the other routes due to no data. Therefore, "Classification not possible" was justified as the classification for specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
Classified into Category 1 from its 48h-EC50 = 0.73 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Test for the Ecological Effect of Chemical Substances (Ministry of the Environment), 1996). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
Classified into Category 1 since its acute toxicity is Category 1 and it is not rapidly degradable (Non-biodegradable, BOD degradation rate: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1998)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
|