Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 52829-07-9
Chemical Name Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate
Substance ID m-nite-52829-07-9_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" in the Classification JIS (corresponding to Category 5 in UN GHS classification) based on an LD50 value of 3,700 mg/kg bw for rats (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" in the Classification JIS (corresponding to Category 5 in UN GHS classification or "Not classified") based on an LD50 value of > 3,170 mg/kg bw for rats (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Category 2


Danger
H330 P304+P340
P403+P233
P260
P271
P284
P310
P320
P405
P501
It was classified in Category 2 based on a 4-hour exposure LC50 value of 0.5 mg/L for rats (SIAP (2008)). Besides, it was regarded as a test on dust because the LC50 value was higher than the saturated vapour pressure concentration (7.03E-09 mg/L). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" because there was minimal irritation in a test by a 24-hour application to the rabbit skin (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 1


Danger
H318 P305+P351+P338
P280
P310
It was classified in Category 1 because there was serious eye damage in a test by an application to the rabbit eye (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" because it was concluded that it was not considered to possess skin sensitization properties based on the available information from two guinea pig tests (a maximization test and a photosensitization test) (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - The classification is not possible due to no in vivo test data. Besides, as for in vitro tests, it is reported that it was negative in both an Ames test and a chromosomal aberration test with human lymphocytes (OECD TG 473) (SIAP (2008)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - In a one-generation reproductive toxicity test by oral administration to rats (OECD TG 415), parent animals showed general toxicity such as decreased weight gain and food consumption in the high dose group (300 mg/kg/day), but there was no reproductive toxicity. And as for developmental toxicity, only slightly decreased pup weights during lactation were observed, and there were no other adverse effects (SIAP (2008)). However, due to no data on the investigation of fetuses at the end of gestation, data are insufficient on effects on the development of offspring. Therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible." FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 1 (systemic)


Danger
H370 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P321
P405
P501
It is reported that signs of dyspnea, trismus, tremor, and sedation were observed in a dose-dependent intensity in all treated animals in an acute toxicity test with rats by 4-hour inhalation exposure (LC50 value: 0.5 mg/L) (SIAP (2008)). The above signs and deaths occurred within the guidance values for Category 1, but because it was hard to specify the target organ, it was classified in Category 1 (systemic toxicity). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Findings reported in repeated dose toxicity tests with rats and dogs were limited to reduced weight gain and distentions of the small intestine in some animals on necropsy in a 28-day repeated oral administration toxicity test with rats (0, 50, 200, 600 mg/kg bw/day), reduced weight gain in a 90-day diet administration toxicity test with rats (males: 0, 26, 80 or 261 mg/kg bw/day, females: 0, 29, 90 or 277 mg/kg bw/day), and reduced weight gain and liver hypertrophy in a 28-day repeated oral administration toxicity test with dogs (males: 0, 27, 69 or 150 mg/kg bw/day, females: 0, 27, 78 or 155 mg/kg bw/day). Because no serious toxicity effects were observed, it was estimated to correspond to "Not classified" in the oral route. However, because effects are unknown in the other routes due to no data, it was classified as "Classification not possible" for this hazard class. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 2
-
-
H401 P273
P501
It was classified in Category 2 from 72-hour ErC50 = 1.1 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1999)). FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (a 28-day degradation rate by OECD Test Guideline 301B: 10-24% (SIAP (Conclusions Agreed in SIAM 26, 2008))), and 72-hour NOEC = 0.050 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1999)).
If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to being not rapidly degradable (a 28-day degradation rate by OECD Test Guideline 301B: 10-24% (SIAP (Conclusions Agreed in SIAM 26, 2008))), and 96-hour LC50 = 4.3 mg/L for fish (Lepomis macrochirus, Oncorhynchus mykiss) (SIAP (Conclusions Agreed in SIAM 26, 2008)).
By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 1.
FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2012 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information