Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 553-26-4
Chemical Name 4,4'-Bipyridyl
Substance ID m-nite-553-26-4_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Flammable solids Not classified
-
-
- - Since it was classified into Class 6.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods ((UN No.2811), it was classified into Not classified.
In addition, this TDG classification is based on the UN number by Merck KGaA data from March 2009.
FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive or self-reactive properties present in the molecule. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - Since it was classified into Class 6.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.2811). In addition, this TDG classification is based on the UN number by Merck KGaA data from March 2009. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - The test method applicable for substances becoming liquid or gas at 140degC of test temperature has not been established. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At) are not included. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - It is an organic compound not containing oxygen, fluorine or chlorine. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The organic compound not including peroxy group in molecule. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 3


Danger
H301 P301+P310
P264
P270
P321
P330
P405
P501
From LD50 value of 400 mg/kg and 172 mg/kg (female)-175 mg/kg (male) (IUCLID (2000)) of the oral administration test employing a rat, the lower value was adopted and it was classified into Category 3. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Category 3


Danger
H311 P302+P352
P361+P364
P280
P312
P321
P405
P501
Since LD50 value of the dermal administration test employing rats was 400-800 mg/kg (IUCLID (2000)), it was classified into Category 3. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Since it was a solid by the definition of GHS and inhalation in gas was not assumed, it was classified into "Not applicable". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - It is written that LC50 value of 4-hour inhalation exposure test employing rats is >0.16 mg/L (IUCLID (2000)). Although the dust standard was applied to this substance from saturated vapor pressure level with 0.013 mg/L (25degC), classification cannot be specified, and classification is not possible. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although there is a description, "not irritating" (IUCLID (2000)) for the 24 hour skin irritation test using rats in the information source of List 2, classification is not possible, because details are unknown nor other data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible since there is no data. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although there is a description of "not sensitizing" in the skin sensitivity test employing guinea pig (IUCLID (2000)), classification is not possible because of no other data. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because there is no data of in vivo examination. In addition, there is a description of "negative" in the in vitro reverse mutation test (mutations test employing a Salmonella typhimurium (GLP)) (IUCLID (2000)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible due to insufficiency of data, because evaluation by major international evaluation institutions has not been performed. Incidentally, there is a description as follows, "Tumors were not found in the skin or other tissues."(IUCLID (2000)) in the 104 week dermal administration test (GLP) using male and female mice. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (lung)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
According to the cited reference of IUCLID (2000) (J. Toxicol.Environ.Health.10 (1982)), there is a description that "with non-lethality dose (female: 100 mg/kg, male: 150 mg/kg), symptom and pathological findings change was not deemed but the deemed symptom was somnolence only in the oral administration test employing a rat. The fatality reaction curve of this substance is a steep slope, and the least fatal doses of female and male rats are 130 mg/kg and 160 mg/kg, respectively. Dead animals have lung hemorrhage, lung dropsy, intra-alveolar bleeding, atelectatic lung, and the congestion was also regarded in lungs, the kidney, and the lien. Moreover, taking into consideration the fact that agricultural-chemicals paraquat which is the dimethyl compound of this substance characteristically damage lungs, it is presumed that this substance's target internal organs are also lungs. In addition, although such symptom was equivalent to Category 1 by judging from the guidance value, it was classified into Category 2 (pneumoconiosiss) according to this guidance because it was data of List2, and doesn't meet the acceptance criteria 1b 3). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (kidney)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
In the document (J. Toxicol.Environ.Health.10 (1982)) cited from the 3-month oral administration test in male and female rats (IUCLID (2000)), there is the description that "concretion and kidney sclerosis (nephrosclerosis) were observed." Although effects on kidney were observed within the dosage in the Category 1 guidance value range, the substance is classified into Category 2 (kidney) according to this guidance because that is the data for List 2 and does not meet the criteria of 1 b3. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information