Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 60-09-3 |
Chemical Name | 4-aminoazobenzene |
Substance ID | m-nite-60-09-3_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The substance contains consecutive nitrogen atoms (azo group). It is an aromatic azo group and does not meet the criteria of chemical groups associated with explosive properties, therefore it is determined as "Not applicable". | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Flammable solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The substance contains consecutive nitrogen atoms (azo group). It is an aromatic azo group and does not meet the criteria of chemical groups associated with explosive properties, therefore it is determined as "Not applicable". | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 degC) substances are not available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H302 | P301+P312 P264 P270 P330 P501 |
Based on the rat LD50 values of 1450 mg/kg and 1640 mg/kg (BUA 21 (2000)), the substance was classified as Category 4. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Based on the rat LD50 values of > 2000 mg/kg (guideline 84/449/EEC, GLP-compliant) (BUA 217 (2000)), the substance was classified as "Not classified". As relevant information, no animal death was observed at 2000 mg/kg. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Although the rat LC50 value of > 2.8 mg/L/4hrs (OECD TG 403, GLP-compliant) was reported (BUA 217 (2000)). However, because the value did not specify the category, and the classification was not possible. According to the description of "aerosol" in the original report, the test substance was judged as dust/mist. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | The substance was classified as "Not classified" based on the documented cases that no irritating effect to rabbit skin was caused either by pure or technical-grade of the substance (BUA 217 (2000)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | The substance was classified as "Not classified" based on the documented cases that technical-grade of the substance caused slight irritation to rabbit eyes, and that in the case of pure substance, such effect was not observed and rabbits eyes exhibited only temporary reddening due to mechanical irritation after treatment (BUA 217 (2000)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Category 1 |
Warning |
H317 | P302+P352 P333+P313 P362+P364 P261 P272 P280 P321 P501 |
In the epidemiological studies for the cohort of patients who revealed dermatitis or eczema, and for workers who were occupationally exposed, there were numerous reports that the substance caused an apparent positive reaction in patch tests (BUA 217 (2000)). Moreover, several case reports that subjects with dermatitis revealed the apparent positive reaction by the substance in patch tests (BUA 217 (2000)). The substance was classified as Category 1 because these documents were regarded as enough evidence indicating the substance concerned causing allergic contact dermatitis in humans. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H341 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the positive results in the micronucleus test using bone marrow cells and peripheral reticulocytes of mice intraperitoneally administered (in vivo mutagenicity test in somatic cells) (BUA 217 (2000)). As relevant information, positive results were reported in the sister chromatid exchange test using bone marrow of mice intraperitoneally administered and in the DNA damage test using liver of rats intraperitoneally administered (in vivo genotoxicity test in somatic cell for both tests) (BUA 217 (2000)). As relevant information, as for in vitro study, positive results in the Ames test were reported (NTP DB (Access on Jul. 2009)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H351 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the criteria of "Group 2B" in the carcinogenicity assessment of the IARC (IARC Suppl. 7 (1987)) and "Group 2B" in Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH) (Recommendations for allowable concentrations, proposed in 1991). As relevant information, in the 104-week dietary administration test in male rats, carcinomas in the liver, which was not found in the control group were observed (IARC 8 (1975)). In the test that this substance was applied to the abdominal skin twice a week over the life of the rat, skin tumors which were not found in the control group were observed (IARC 8 (1975)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data. As relevant information, it was reported that the estrous cycle was completely inhibited in the female rat after 7 to 35 days of application by feeding (BUA 217 (2000)). It was also reported that the dye solvent, aminoazobenzene, induced malformations in mice (Birth Defects, 3rd (2000)). However, the details were unclear about both studies. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 2 (blood) |
Warning |
H371 | P308+P311 P260 P264 P270 P405 P501 |
In the 4-hour inhalation study (OECD TG 403, GLP-compliant) in rats exposed at the concentrations of 0.023 - 2.8 mg/L (dusts/mists), in addition to dose dependent increases in methemoglobin concentration, clinical symptoms such as bradypnea and cyanosis were observed in the middle and high dose groups (0.341 - 2.8 mg/L) (BUA 217 (2000)). Cyanosis was also observed in the dermal study (guideline 84/449/EEC, GLP-compliant) in rats applied at 2000 mg/kg (BUA 217 (2000)). As described above, since dose-dependent increases in methemoglobin level and accompanying clinical signs occurred at the dose levels equivalent to Category 2 of the guidance values, the substance was classified as Category 2 (blood). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data. As relevant information, hemolytic anemia with disturbed erythrocyte maturation, formation of Howell-Jolly bodies, hemosiderin deposition in the liver, spleen and kidneys, and centrilobular hyaline degeneration in the liver were observed at the dose of 0.1% (converted dose level as that of 90-day study: approx. 20 mg/kg/day) after 35 - 41 days in the feeding study in rats (BUA 217 (2000)). However, it was described that the data were insufficient as the evidence because the study was conducted with only one dose group without control group and the test method had deficiency (BUA 217 (2000)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
Classified into Category 1 from its 48h-EC50 = 0.07 mg/L for crustacea (Cerodaphnia dubia) (BUA 217, 2000). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
Classified into Category 1 since its acute toxicity is Category 1 and it is not rapidly degradable (BOD degradation rate: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 2002)). | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. | FY2010 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
|