Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 60-09-3
Chemical Name 4-aminoazobenzene
Substance ID m-nite-60-09-3_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance contains consecutive nitrogen atoms (azo group). It is an aromatic azo group and does not meet the criteria of chemical groups associated with explosive properties, therefore it is determined as "Not applicable". FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance contains consecutive nitrogen atoms (azo group). It is an aromatic azo group and does not meet the criteria of chemical groups associated with explosive properties, therefore it is determined as "Not applicable". FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 degC) substances are not available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
Based on the rat LD50 values of 1450 mg/kg and 1640 mg/kg (BUA 21 (2000)), the substance was classified as Category 4. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the rat LD50 values of > 2000 mg/kg (guideline 84/449/EEC, GLP-compliant) (BUA 217 (2000)), the substance was classified as "Not classified". As relevant information, no animal death was observed at 2000 mg/kg. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although the rat LC50 value of > 2.8 mg/L/4hrs (OECD TG 403, GLP-compliant) was reported (BUA 217 (2000)). However, because the value did not specify the category, and the classification was not possible. According to the description of "aerosol" in the original report, the test substance was judged as dust/mist. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - The substance was classified as "Not classified" based on the documented cases that no irritating effect to rabbit skin was caused either by pure or technical-grade of the substance (BUA 217 (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Not classified
-
-
- - The substance was classified as "Not classified" based on the documented cases that technical-grade of the substance caused slight irritation to rabbit eyes, and that in the case of pure substance, such effect was not observed and rabbits eyes exhibited only temporary reddening due to mechanical irritation after treatment (BUA 217 (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Skin sensitization Category 1


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
In the epidemiological studies for the cohort of patients who revealed dermatitis or eczema, and for workers who were occupationally exposed, there were numerous reports that the substance caused an apparent positive reaction in patch tests (BUA 217 (2000)). Moreover, several case reports that subjects with dermatitis revealed the apparent positive reaction by the substance in patch tests (BUA 217 (2000)). The substance was classified as Category 1 because these documents were regarded as enough evidence indicating the substance concerned causing allergic contact dermatitis in humans. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Category 2


Warning
H341 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the positive results in the micronucleus test using bone marrow cells and peripheral reticulocytes of mice intraperitoneally administered (in vivo mutagenicity test in somatic cells) (BUA 217 (2000)). As relevant information, positive results were reported in the sister chromatid exchange test using bone marrow of mice intraperitoneally administered and in the DNA damage test using liver of rats intraperitoneally administered (in vivo genotoxicity test in somatic cell for both tests) (BUA 217 (2000)). As relevant information, as for in vitro study, positive results in the Ames test were reported (NTP DB (Access on Jul. 2009)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Carcinogenicity Category 2


Warning
H351 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
The substance was classified as Category 2 based on the criteria of "Group 2B" in the carcinogenicity assessment of the IARC (IARC Suppl. 7 (1987)) and "Group 2B" in Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH) (Recommendations for allowable concentrations, proposed in 1991). As relevant information, in the 104-week dietary administration test in male rats, carcinomas in the liver, which was not found in the control group were observed (IARC 8 (1975)). In the test that this substance was applied to the abdominal skin twice a week over the life of the rat, skin tumors which were not found in the control group were observed (IARC 8 (1975)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - The classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data. As relevant information, it was reported that the estrous cycle was completely inhibited in the female rat after 7 to 35 days of application by feeding (BUA 217 (2000)). It was also reported that the dye solvent, aminoazobenzene, induced malformations in mice (Birth Defects, 3rd (2000)). However, the details were unclear about both studies. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (blood)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
In the 4-hour inhalation study (OECD TG 403, GLP-compliant) in rats exposed at the concentrations of 0.023 - 2.8 mg/L (dusts/mists), in addition to dose dependent increases in methemoglobin concentration, clinical symptoms such as bradypnea and cyanosis were observed in the middle and high dose groups (0.341 - 2.8 mg/L) (BUA 217 (2000)). Cyanosis was also observed in the dermal study (guideline 84/449/EEC, GLP-compliant) in rats applied at 2000 mg/kg (BUA 217 (2000)). As described above, since dose-dependent increases in methemoglobin level and accompanying clinical signs occurred at the dose levels equivalent to Category 2 of the guidance values, the substance was classified as Category 2 (blood). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - The classification was not possible due to lack of sufficient data. As relevant information, hemolytic anemia with disturbed erythrocyte maturation, formation of Howell-Jolly bodies, hemosiderin deposition in the liver, spleen and kidneys, and centrilobular hyaline degeneration in the liver were observed at the dose of 0.1% (converted dose level as that of 90-day study: approx. 20 mg/kg/day) after 35 - 41 days in the feeding study in rats (BUA 217 (2000)). However, it was described that the data were insufficient as the evidence because the study was conducted with only one dose group without control group and the test method had deficiency (BUA 217 (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
Classified into Category 1 from its 48h-EC50 = 0.07 mg/L for crustacea (Cerodaphnia dubia) (BUA 217, 2000). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Classified into Category 1 since its acute toxicity is Category 1 and it is not rapidly degradable (BOD degradation rate: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 2002)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information