Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 64-02-8
Chemical Name Tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate
Substance ID m-nite-64-02-8_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - Since no test results are available, classification is not possible. As relevant notes, it is reported that this substance is combustible (ICSC (2006)) and it doesn't easily ignite (nicht leichtentzuendlich) (IUCLID (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - Since its auto ignition point is 260 degC (Selbstentzuendung rnit Luft bei 260 Grad C.) (IUCLID (2000), Original literature: BASF AG Ludwigshafen), it is considered that the substance does not ignite at room temperature. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Since no test results are available, classification is not possible. As relevant note, it is reported that this substance is combustible (ICSC (2006)) and it doesn't easily ignite (nicht leichtentzuendlich) (IUCLID (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified
-
-
- - Although it contains a metal (Na), its water solubility is 103 g/100 mL (Merck (14th, 2006)) and it is considered that the substance doesn't react strongly with water. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
14 Oxidizing solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although this substance is an organic compound containing oxygen which is chemically bonded to Na, other than carbon or hydrogen, due to lack of additional data, classification is not possible. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
The five LD50 values of 2700, 3200, 1700, 1780 - 1913 and 1210 - 2150 mg/kg for rats were documented in the data from the "List 1" information source designated in the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government (EU-RAR (2004)). The two data are equivalent to the guidance value of Category 4, the other two are "Not classified" category (corresponding to Category 5 in the UN-GHS classification), and the other one is Category 4 or Category 5. The applicable amount of the data for each Category 4 and "Not classified" category was the same. Selecting the category of greater hazard, the substance was classified as Category 4. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - The classification was not possible due to lack of data. Although it was reported that no mortalities occurred in the 8-hour inhalation test for rats with dust (EU-RAR (2004)), the test concentration was uncertain. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - In the rabbit test (OECD TG 404) by contact with 80% aqueous solution for 4 hours, the average score of erythema at 24, 48 and 72 hours after application were 1, 0, and 0.3, respectively, and the symptoms disappeared after 8 days. Edema was not observed (EU-RAR (2004)). Based on the result, the substance was classified as "Not classified". In other rabbit studies by contact with 80% aqueous solution for 20 hours, severe erythema and exfoliation were observed after 24 hours and 8 days respectively. But edema was not observed (EU-RAR (2004)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2A


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
In the rabbit test, instillation of 50 mg of an 88% aqueous preparation of the substance to the eye of one rabbit resulted in strong irritation at 1 - 24 hours application, and extreme edema, mild corneal opacity, pus formation were observed. After 8 days, a mild corneal opacity was seen (EU-RAR (2004)). In the other rabbit test which exposed 0.1ml of 40% aqueous preparation of the substance to the eye of three rabbits, irritation scores after 72 hours were 1 for corneal opacity, 1 for iritis, 3 for conjunctivae redness and 2 - 3 for chemosis (EU-RAR (2004)). Based on the information, the substance was classified as Category 2A. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Insufficient data were available. As relevant information, a 78-year-old woman with recurrent leg ulcers revealed a positive response by twice contact to the aqueous solution of this substance (EU-RAR (2004)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - The classification was not possible due to lack of in vivo test data. As relevant information, as for in vitro studies, negative results were reported in the Ames test (HSDB (2004)), the chromosome aberration test using CHO cells, and the transformation test using Syrian hamster embryo cells (IUCLID (2000)). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - In the developmental toxicity test in rats by oral administration of the test substance from 7th to 14th day of gestational period, general toxic signs containing diarrhea and depression of activity and reduced weight gain were observed in the dams, while the mortality index of offspring by postimplantation loss, litter size and mean fetal body weight were comparable to that of the control group. The evidence indicated the teratogenicity was not found in the external, visceral and skeletal examinations (EU-RAR (2004)). However, since sufficient information was not provided regarding sexual functions and fertility of parental animals, the substance was classified as "Classification not possible". FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (systemic)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
It was reported that there were multiple data on acute oral toxicity studies with rats (LD50 value: 1210 - 3200 mg/kg), and the most prominent clinical signs were dyspnea, ataxic gait, abnormal gait, tremor or piloerection, and that autopsy findings of redness and hemorrhagic ulcer of the glandular part of the stomach, redness of the mucous membranes of the intestine and systemic hyperemia or flaccid intestines (EU-RAR (2004)). It was difficult to identify the target organ(s) from the findings described above, and the effects were seen in the doses equivalent to Category 2 of the guidance values or more. Therefore, the substance was classified as Category 2 (systemic toxicity). FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2010 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" from 96-hour LC50 = 157 mg/L [converted value 121 H4EDTA mg/L] for fish (Lepomis macrochirus) (EU RAR: 2004). FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Not classified
-
-
- - If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified as "Not classified" from 21-day NOEC (reproduction, lethal) = 28 mg/L [22 H4EDTA mg/L (converted value)] for crustacea (Daphnia magna) and 35-day NOEC (effects unknown) > 35 mg/L [26.8 H4EDTA mg/L (converted value)] for fish (Danio rerio) (both EU RAR: 2004) despite unknown environmental dynamics of the inorganic compound.
Because there are no acute toxicity data for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained (for algae), the classification is not possible.
From the above results, it was classified as "Not classified."
FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information