Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 7727-21-1
Chemical Name Dipotassium peroxodisulfate
Substance ID m-nite-7727-21-1_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified
-
-
- - Although the "adjacent oxygen atom" associated with explosive properties is included, it was classified into Not classified because it was classified into Class 5.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.1492(ICSC, 2002)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Flammable solids Not classified
-
-
- - Although the "adjacent oxygen atom" associated with explosive properties is included, it was classified into Not classified because it was classified into Class 5.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.1492(ICSC, 2002)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified
-
-
- - Although the "adjacent oxygen atom" associated with explosive properties is included, it was classified into Not classified because it was classified into Class 5.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.1492(ICSC, 2002)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - Non-combustible inorganic compounds. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Not classified
-
-
- - Non-combustible inorganic compounds. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At) are not included. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
14 Oxidizing solids Category 3


Warning
H272 P370+P378
P210
P220
P280
P501
Since it was classified into Class 5.1 and PG III in the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN No.1492(ICSC, 2002)), it was classified into Category 3. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Inorganic compound FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 4


Warning
H302 P301+P312
P264
P270
P330
P501
It was classified into Category 4 from LD50 value 1,130 mg/kg (male) (SIDS (2005), NICNAS (2001), IUCLID (2000)) of the oral administration test employing a rat. In addition, in EU classification, it is Xn; R22 (EU-Annex I) and is equivalent to Category 3-4. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Since LD50 value of the dermal administration test employing rats was >10,000 mg/kg (SIDS (2005), NICNAS (2001)), it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Since it was a solid by the definition of GHS and inhalation in gas was not assumed, it was classified into "Not applicable". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Not classified
-
-
- - Since it is written that LC50 value of 1-hour inhalation exposure test employing rats is >42.9 mg/L (SIDS (2005), IUCLID (2000)), 4-hour equivalent LC50 value is >10.7 mg/L when applying the dust standard due to a solid. Therefore, it was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
For animals, although "not irritating" has been described in the skin irritation test with rabbits (SIDS (2005)), the details including exposure time are unknown. For humans, there is a description of "irritative" in the test in which a 17.5% solution of this substance was applied for 4 hours (SIDS (2005)). For humans, SIDS (2005) has described "can cause skin irritation" in 5% or more solution of this substance as a conclusion. Therefore, it was classified into Category 2. In addition, it can be classified as Xi in the EU classification; R36/ 37/ 38 (EU-Annex I), being equivalent to Category 2-3. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - For animals, there is a description of "It is the eye irritation test employing eight rabbits and any of average score value in the cornea, the iris, and the conjunctiva is 0."(SIDS (2005)). Moreover, in NICNAS (2001), there is a description of "marginal irritation to rabbit eyes" about the same test. Furthermore, although SIDS (2005) has a description of "Peroxydisulfuric are harmful to human eyes", since other data cannot be found, classification is not possible due to insufficient data. In addition, the EU classification is Xi; R36/37/38 (EU-Annex I), and is equivalent to Category 2. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Respiratory sensitization Category 1


Danger
H334 P304+P340
P342+P311
P261
P284
P501
For humans, it has been described that "2, 3, and 3 of 52 persons of manufacturing factory employees were positive to this substance alone, the related substance of Diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0) alone, and both of this substance and Diammonium salt, respectively. The correlation trend was indicated between positive results and slight decrease of lung function." in vivo immunological test (skin prick test) (SIDS (2005)). Moreover, there is also a report of occupational asthma in beauticians, and it has been concluded that "test results in humans show that the substance is a respiratory sensitizer in occupational exposure"in SIDS (2005). As mentioned above, it was classified into Category 1. In addition, it can be classified as Xi; R42/43 (EU-Annex I) in the EU classifications, which is equivalent to Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Skin sensitization Category 1


Warning
H317 P302+P352
P333+P313
P362+P364
P261
P272
P280
P321
P501
For humans, it has been described in SIDS (2005) that there are two positive reports including one in study auxiliary service and another in beauticians in the patch test to which a 2.5% solution of the substance was applied. Moreover, about the relative substance of diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0), it has been described that "eczema, skin diseases, and pimples were developed" (SIDS (2005)) or that "allergic dermatitis was observed" (NICNAS (2001)) as occupational exposures in beauticians, and it has been concluded that "test results in humans show that the substance is a skin sensitizer in occupational exposure" in SIDS (2005). As mentioned above, it was classified into Category 1. In addition, it can be classified as Xi; R42/43 (EU-Annex I) in the EU classifications, which is equivalent to Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because there is no data. In addition, there is a description of "negative" in the in vivo mutagenicity test (micronucleus test employing mouse erythrocyte) and in the in vivo genotoxicity test (UDS test using rat hepatocytes), respectively, for Disodium peroxydisulfate (CAS No.7775-27-1) which is a substance (SIDS (2005), NICNAS (2001)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Since no evaluation by major international evaluation agencies is made and there is no data, classification is not possible. In addition, it is recommended to refer also to the category result of the Diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0) which is a relative substance. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because there is no data. Refer to the classification result of a related substance, Diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (systemic), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation)



Warning
H371
H335
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
The single-dose studies which calculates oral lethal dose of rats has a description that "a hypoactivity (depression), shallow breathings (weak breathing), and respiratory distress were acknowledged. Such symptoms were recovered within four days in live animals" (SIDS (2005)). This impact was seen within the limits of the guidance value of Category 2. Moreover, there is also a description of "nasal discharges and dyspnea" (SIDS (2005)) as human impacts. As mentioned above, it was classified into Category 2 (systemic toxicity) and Category 3 (Respiratory tract irritation). In addition, it is recommended to also refer to the category result of the Diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0) which is a relative substance. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - In the 28-day repeated oral administration test to male rats, there is the description that "no toxic effect was detected" (SIDS (2005)), but the details are unknown because the data is non-public. Since there is no other test data, classification is not possible because of lack of sufficient data. In addition, also refer to the classification result of the related substance, Diammonium salt (CAS No.7727-54-0). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Reliable acute toxicity data were not obtained. FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2018 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information