Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

日本語で表示



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 89-05-4
Chemical Name 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylic acid
Substance ID m-nite-89-05-4_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link)  
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link)  
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. Besides, there is information that it is combustible (GESTIS (2021)). FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
17 Desensitized explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified."
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, (1) was not used for classification because the assessment method was unknown.

[Reference Data, etc.]
(1) It was reported that, in an acute dermal irritation/corrosion test with rabbits (equivalent to OECD TG 404, observation for 8 days), the mean erythema and edema scores (full score: 8 respectively) at 4 hours after application were 1.28 and 0.11 respectively and both erythema and edema fully resolved within 8 days (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, (1) was not used for classification because the assessment method was unknown.

[Reference Data, etc.]
(1) It was reported that, in an acute eye irritation/corrosion test with rabbits (equivalent to OECD TG405, observation for 6 days), the mean overall irritation score at 72 hours after application was 3.75 (full score: 110) and the irritation fully reversible within 6 days (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in a Buehler test (OECD TG 406, topical administration: 60% solution) with guinea pigs (n=20), the positive rate was 0% (0/20 cases) at both 30 and 54 hours after challenge (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
There were no in vivo findings and classification was not possible due to lack of data.

[Evidence Data]
(1) In a bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG471), negative results were reported (Toxicity Testing Results for Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law (2007), REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
(2) In a chromosome aberration test using the cultured mammalian cells (CHL) (OECD TG473, GLP), false-positive results (no polyploid aberrations, an increase in the incidence of structural abnormal cells: nonspecific effect due to a decrease in pH in the medium) were reported. Besides, concerning this test result, negative results were reported in the REACH registration dossier (Toxicity Testing Results for Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law (2009)).
(3) In a chromosomal aberration test (OECD TG473) using the cultured mammalian cells (CHL), negative results were reported (REACH registration dossier (Accessed May 2021)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, since (1) was a screening test, it was not possible to judge that this substance had no reproductive toxicity. In addition, there was no data available on developmental toxicity.

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with rats dosed by gavage (OECD TG 422, GLP, for 42 days in total in cluding 14 days before mating and the mating period (males), for 41 to 46 days in total including 14 days before mating, throughout mating and during gestation and until day 4 of lactation (females)), no reproductive toxicity was observed (Toxicity Testing Results for Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law (2009)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), it was classified as "Not classified" in the oral route. However, classification was not possible due to lack of data since there was not sufficient information available for classification in other routes.

[Evidence Data]
(1) It was reported that, in a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test with rats dosed by gavage (OECD TG422, GLP, for 41 to 46 days), no effects were observed at 300 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 137 to 153 mg/kg/day, in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (Toxicity Testing Results for Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law (2009)).
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2021 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information