Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 95-47-6
Chemical Name o-Xylene
Substance ID m-nite-95-47-6_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
6 Flammable liquids Category 3


Warning
H226 P303+P361+P353
P370+P378
P403+P235
P210
P233
P240
P241
P242
P243
P280
P501
It was classified in Category 3 based on a flash point of 32 deg C (closed cup) (ICSC (2002)).
Besides, it is clasified in Class 3, PG II, III (UN1307) in UNRTDG.
FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 463 deg C (ICSC (2002)). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
16 Corrosive to metals Not classified
-
-
- - Steel and most of other metals are durable as a container (Hommel (1991)). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on reports of LD50 values of 3,600 mg/kg (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) and 3,608 mg/kg (EHC 190, 1997) for rats, this substance was classified as "Not classified" (Category 5 in the UN GHS classification). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on an LD50 value of > 3,160 mg/kg for rabbits (HSDB (Access on June 2014)), this substance was classified as "Not classified." FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Category 4


Warning
H332 P304+P340
P261
P271
P312
Based on reports of LC50 values (6 hours) of 4,330 ppm (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 5,303 ppm) (EHC 190 (1997)) and ca. 4,000 ppm (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 4,899 ppm) (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) for rats, this substance was classified in Category 4. Besides, these LC50 values are lower than 90% of the saturated vapour concentration (6,910 ppm), the reference value with ppm as the unit was applied as a vapour without a mist. The new information source (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) was added, and the previous category was revised. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, there is a report that erythema, edema, desquamation and necrosis were observed in a test in which a xylene mixture containing this substance was applied to the skin of rabbits, and this substance was evaluated as a mild to strong skin irritant (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). The data used in the previous classification was not adopted because the data was data of a mixture. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, there is a report that slight irritation was shown in a test in which a xylene mixture containing this substance was applied to the eyes of rabbits (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). The data used in the previous classification was not adopted because the data was data of a mixture. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - The substance was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was not possible to classify a substance as "Not classified" according to the revised GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government. As for in vivo, it was negative in a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ATSDR (2007), IARC 47 (1989)). As for in vitro, it was negative in a bacterial reverse mutation test and a chromosomal aberration test (NTP DB (Access on July 2014), Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), IARC 47 (1989), ACGIH (7th, 2001), OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 2001)). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was classified in Group 3 by IARC (IARC 71, 1989) and in A4 by ACGIH (7th, 2001). FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - In teratogenicity tests with mice and rats by the inhalation route, slight effects in fetuses (decreased fetal body weight and delayed ossification) were observed at doses where maternal toxicities were observed or not observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Besides, a report, used as the evidence of the previous classification, that in a teratogenicity test with mice by the oral route, toxicities in maternal animals and death and cleft palate in fetuses were observed, originated from an abstract of the lecture, and its reliability was not sufficient. Therefore, the report was not adopted as the information source of evidence of this classification.
Consequently, since effects on fetuses were marginal regardless of whether there were maternal toxicities, it corresponded to "Not classified" for teratogenicity. However, due to insufficient information on fertility available, this substance was classified as "Classification not possible."
FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects)



Danger
Warning
H370
H335
H336
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P321
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
Although data on an isomer mixture (industrial xylene) containing ethylbenzene were available, no human effects' data of o-xylene were found.
In experimental animals, by the inhalation exposure of mice to this substance, increased locomotor activity, decreased respiratory rate, biphasic central nervous system response (depression and excitation), and death at 4,600 ppm and a 50% decrease in a respiratory rate at 1,450 ppm were observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2007), EHC 190 (1997)). In neurobehavioral studies, inhalation in mice caused impaired operant behavior at 5,179 ppm, immobility in a behavioral despair swimming test at 1,010 ppm, and 11% shortened duration of response of extension at 320 ppm, and in an inhalation test with rats, 18.8% shortened duration of hindlimb extension response to an electrical shock was observed at 230 ppm (ATSDR (2007)). In addition, it is reported that in inhalation exposure of mice, excitation of the central nervous system at low concentrations and depression of the central nervous system at high concentrations occurred (EHC 190 (1997)). These findings on the central nervous system were observed within the guidance value range for Category 1.
In SIAP (2003) (not described in SIAR), as common effects among xylene isomers, central nervous system depression, incoordination, prostration and coma were described. It was described in ACGIH (7th, 2001) that xylene isomers were irritating to the respiratory tract.
Therefore, this substance was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system) and Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation and narcotic effects).
FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although no human effects' data by exposure to this substance alone was available, effects on the nervous system (headache, dizziness, confusion, impaired muscle coordination) and effects on the blood system (anemia and decreased number of leukocytes) were known by occupational inhalation exposure to a high concentration of xylene mixture (including partly concomitant exposure to benzene or toluene) (ATSDR (2007), Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Furthermore, in experiments in which human volunteers were exposed by inhalation to m- or p-xylene, there for a short time (mostly within 5 days), there is a report that neurological symptoms such as decreased response, decreased equilibrium and headaches were observed while there is also a report that such effects were not observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)).
As for experimental animals, on the other hand, available data by exposure to this substance alone was very limited, and only in a 6-week inhalation test with dogs exposed to the vapour of this substance, tremor was observed in 1 out of 3 animals at a concentration above the upper limit of Category 2 (3.358 mg/L: 1.55 mg/L/6 hours (converted guidance value)) (ATSDR, 2007, Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). From the above, evidence was not sufficient to judge the effects by exposure to this substance alone as the effects on the nervous system, therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data.
FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
10 Aspiration hazard Category 1


Danger
H304 P301+P310
P331
P405
P501
Since this substance is a hydrocarbon and its kinematic viscosity is 0.86 mm2/s (25 deg C, calculated by CERI), it was classified in Category 1. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified in Category 1 from 72-hour ErC50 = 0.799 mg/L for algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1996), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012)) FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 2


-
H411 P273
P391
P501
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 2 due to not known whether it is rapidly degradable, and 21-day NOEC = 0.407 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012)).
If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to rapid degradability (a degradation rate by BOD = 67.8% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1975)) despite not known whether it is rapidly degradable, and 96-hour LC50 = 7.424 mg/L for fish (Oryzias latipes) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1996), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012), Initial Risk Assessment (NITE, CERI, NEDO, 2005)).
By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 2.
FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. FY2014 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information