Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 95-47-6 |
Chemical Name | o-Xylene |
Substance ID | m-nite-95-47-6_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Category 3 |
Warning |
H226 | P303+P361+P353 P370+P378 P403+P235 P210 P233 P240 P241 P242 P243 P280 P501 |
It was classified in Category 3 based on a flash point of 32 deg C (closed cup) (ICSC (2002)). Besides, it is clasified in Class 3, PG II, III (UN1307) in UNRTDG. |
FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
7 | Flammable solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 463 deg C (ICSC (2002)). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Steel and most of other metals are durable as a container (Hommel (1991)). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Based on reports of LD50 values of 3,600 mg/kg (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) and 3,608 mg/kg (EHC 190, 1997) for rats, this substance was classified as "Not classified" (Category 5 in the UN GHS classification). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Based on an LD50 value of > 3,160 mg/kg for rabbits (HSDB (Access on June 2014)), this substance was classified as "Not classified." | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H332 | P304+P340 P261 P271 P312 |
Based on reports of LC50 values (6 hours) of 4,330 ppm (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 5,303 ppm) (EHC 190 (1997)) and ca. 4,000 ppm (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 4,899 ppm) (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) for rats, this substance was classified in Category 4. Besides, these LC50 values are lower than 90% of the saturated vapour concentration (6,910 ppm), the reference value with ppm as the unit was applied as a vapour without a mist. The new information source (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)) was added, and the previous category was revised. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, there is a report that erythema, edema, desquamation and necrosis were observed in a test in which a xylene mixture containing this substance was applied to the skin of rabbits, and this substance was evaluated as a mild to strong skin irritant (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). The data used in the previous classification was not adopted because the data was data of a mixture. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, there is a report that slight irritation was shown in a test in which a xylene mixture containing this substance was applied to the eyes of rabbits (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). The data used in the previous classification was not adopted because the data was data of a mixture. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | The substance was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was not possible to classify a substance as "Not classified" according to the revised GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government. As for in vivo, it was negative in a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ATSDR (2007), IARC 47 (1989)). As for in vitro, it was negative in a bacterial reverse mutation test and a chromosomal aberration test (NTP DB (Access on July 2014), Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), IARC 47 (1989), ACGIH (7th, 2001), OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 2001)). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance was classified as "Classification not possible" because it was classified in Group 3 by IARC (IARC 71, 1989) and in A4 by ACGIH (7th, 2001). | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | In teratogenicity tests with mice and rats by the inhalation route, slight effects in fetuses (decreased fetal body weight and delayed ossification) were observed at doses where maternal toxicities were observed or not observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Besides, a report, used as the evidence of the previous classification, that in a teratogenicity test with mice by the oral route, toxicities in maternal animals and death and cleft palate in fetuses were observed, originated from an abstract of the lecture, and its reliability was not sufficient. Therefore, the report was not adopted as the information source of evidence of this classification. Consequently, since effects on fetuses were marginal regardless of whether there were maternal toxicities, it corresponded to "Not classified" for teratogenicity. However, due to insufficient information on fertility available, this substance was classified as "Classification not possible." |
FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 1 (central nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects) |
Danger Warning |
H370 H335 H336 |
P308+P311 P260 P264 P270 P321 P405 P501 P304+P340 P403+P233 P261 P271 P312 |
Although data on an isomer mixture (industrial xylene) containing ethylbenzene were available, no human effects' data of o-xylene were found. In experimental animals, by the inhalation exposure of mice to this substance, increased locomotor activity, decreased respiratory rate, biphasic central nervous system response (depression and excitation), and death at 4,600 ppm and a 50% decrease in a respiratory rate at 1,450 ppm were observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2007), EHC 190 (1997)). In neurobehavioral studies, inhalation in mice caused impaired operant behavior at 5,179 ppm, immobility in a behavioral despair swimming test at 1,010 ppm, and 11% shortened duration of response of extension at 320 ppm, and in an inhalation test with rats, 18.8% shortened duration of hindlimb extension response to an electrical shock was observed at 230 ppm (ATSDR (2007)). In addition, it is reported that in inhalation exposure of mice, excitation of the central nervous system at low concentrations and depression of the central nervous system at high concentrations occurred (EHC 190 (1997)). These findings on the central nervous system were observed within the guidance value range for Category 1. In SIAP (2003) (not described in SIAR), as common effects among xylene isomers, central nervous system depression, incoordination, prostration and coma were described. It was described in ACGIH (7th, 2001) that xylene isomers were irritating to the respiratory tract. Therefore, this substance was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system) and Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation and narcotic effects). |
FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Although no human effects' data by exposure to this substance alone was available, effects on the nervous system (headache, dizziness, confusion, impaired muscle coordination) and effects on the blood system (anemia and decreased number of leukocytes) were known by occupational inhalation exposure to a high concentration of xylene mixture (including partly concomitant exposure to benzene or toluene) (ATSDR (2007), Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). Furthermore, in experiments in which human volunteers were exposed by inhalation to m- or p-xylene, there for a short time (mostly within 5 days), there is a report that neurological symptoms such as decreased response, decreased equilibrium and headaches were observed while there is also a report that such effects were not observed (Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). As for experimental animals, on the other hand, available data by exposure to this substance alone was very limited, and only in a 6-week inhalation test with dogs exposed to the vapour of this substance, tremor was observed in 1 out of 3 animals at a concentration above the upper limit of Category 2 (3.358 mg/L: 1.55 mg/L/6 hours (converted guidance value)) (ATSDR, 2007, Hazard Assessment Report (CERI, NITE, 2008)). From the above, evidence was not sufficient to judge the effects by exposure to this substance alone as the effects on the nervous system, therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data. |
FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Category 1 |
Danger |
H304 | P301+P310 P331 P405 P501 |
Since this substance is a hydrocarbon and its kinematic viscosity is 0.86 mm2/s (25 deg C, calculated by CERI), it was classified in Category 1. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 72-hour ErC50 = 0.799 mg/L for algae (Desmodesmus subspicatus) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1996), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012)) | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 2 |
- |
H411 | P273 P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 2 due to not known whether it is rapidly degradable, and 21-day NOEC = 0.407 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012)). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 2 due to rapid degradability (a degradation rate by BOD = 67.8% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1975)) despite not known whether it is rapidly degradable, and 96-hour LC50 = 7.424 mg/L for fish (Oryzias latipes) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Environment Agency in Japan (Environment Agency, 1996), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol. 10 (Ministry of the Environment, 2012), Initial Risk Assessment (NITE, CERI, NEDO, 2005)). By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 2. |
FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. | FY2014 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.0)) |
|