Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 95-94-3 |
Chemical Name | 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene |
Substance ID | 24A6074 |
Classification year (FY) | FY2012 |
Ministry who conducted the classification | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE) |
New/Revised | New |
Classification result in other fiscal year | |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | Physical Hazards and Health Hazards: GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) Environmental Hazards: UN GHS Document (4th revised edition) |
UN GHS document (External link) | UN GHS document |
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Model Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | eChemPortal |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. |
2 | Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
3 | Aerosols | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
7 | Flammable solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | It is combustible (ICSC (J) (2003)), but the classification is not possible due to no data in the prescribed test. |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing chlorine (but not fluorine or oxygen) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H302 |
P301+P312
P264 P270 P330 P501 |
There is a report on two LD50 values of 1,500 mg/kg and 3,105 mg/kg for rats (EHC 128 (1991)), one of them corresponds to Category 4, and the other corresponds to "Not classified." A more hazardous category was adopted, and it was classified in Category 4. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" because it is reported that no appreciable irritation was observed in a test by a repeated application of a 10% solution to the ear or abdominal skin of rabbits (BUA 86 (1991)), and it is described that this substance was concluded to be non-irritating in a skin irritation test (OECD TG 404) (BUA 86 (1991)). |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is reported that slight mucous membrane irritation was observed in a test in which a 1% or 10% solution was applied to the rabbit eye for three consecutive days (BUA 86 (1991)), while it is described that this substance was concluded to be non-irritating in an eye irritation test (OECD TG 405) (BUA 86 (1991)). Therefore, it was classified as "Not classified." |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | It is reported that a skin sensitization test with guinea pigs (a procedure similar to that of a Draize Test) gave a negative result (BUA 86 (1991)), but the test method was not the one approved by OECD, and the details are unknown. Therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data. |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" based on negative results in a micronucleus test with peripheral blood after diet administration to mice and a chromosomal aberration test with bone marrow cells after intraperitoneal administration to mice (both in vivo somatic cell mutagenicity test) (NTP DB (Access on Aug. 2012)). Besides, it is reported that it was negative in a sister chromatid exchange test with bone marrow cells after intraperitoneal administration to mice (in vivo somatic cell genotoxicity test), and as for in vitro tests, there are reports on negative results in all of an Ames test (NTP DB (1981)), a chromosomal aberration test with CHO cells of Chinese hamsters (NTP DB (Access on Aug. 2012)), and a mouse lymphoma test (BUA 210 (1997)). |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Category 2, Additional category: Effects on or via lactation |
Warning |
H361
H362 |
P308+P313
P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
It was classified in Category 2 because a significant decrease in the number of live pups was observed at the dose where parent animals showed general toxicity such as increased weights and enlargement of the liver or kidney in a test by diet administration to mice from 7 days before mating and during a 92-day mating period according to the continuous breeding protocol (NTP Report # RACB89010 (1991)). And it is reported that in a two-generation reproductive test with rats, an analysis of the content of the stomach of offspring dying during lactation revealed that the substance that had accumulated in the fat of maternal animals was transferred to offspring via milk (BUA 86 (1991)). Therefore, it was classified in the Additional category: Effects on or via lactation. Besides, no teratogenicity of this substance is reported in tests by oral administration to rats or rabbits during the gestation period including the organogenesis period (EHC 128 (1991), BUA 86 (1991)). |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 3 (Narcotic effects) |
Warning |
H336 |
P304+P340
P403+P233 P261 P271 P312 P405 P501 |
It was classified in Category 3 (narcotic effects) because signs such as depression, flaccid muscle tone, prostration, hypothermia, and coma were observed in a test by single oral administration of 200-4,000 mg/kg to rats (LD50 value: 3,105 mg/kg) (EHC 128 (1991)). Besides, oral administration of 30 or 300 mg/kg to male rats caused damage in the kidney, and diffuse interstitial nephritis was found (BUA 86 (1991)), but the finding in the kidney was not adopted for the rationale for classification because it was confirmed that it was alpha-2micro-globulin nephropathy specific to male rats (BUA 86 (1991)). And it is described that increased liver enzyme activity indicating live effects and slight anisokaryosis were seen at 300 mg/kg (BUA 86 (1991)), but these were not adopted for classification because there was no further information. |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 1 (kidney, thyroid), Category 2 (liver, blood) |
Danger Warning |
H372
H373 |
P260
P264 P270 P314 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 (kidney, thyroid), Category 2 (liver) because lesions in the kidney, liver, and thyroid were observed within the dose range of 30-2,000 ppm (1.5-100 mg/kg/day) corresponding to guidance values for Category 1 or 2 in a 13-week diet administration test with rats (doses: 0, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, 2,000 ppm) (NTP TOX 7 (1991)). As findings in the kidney, lesions consistent with hyaline droplet nephropathy (renal cortical tubular epithelial hyaline droplet formation) with medullary granular casts and mineralization were found in males at or above 30 ppm (1.5 mg/kg/day), but renal cortical tubular cell degeneration was seen in both males and females. As for the liver, only centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy was observed at or above 30 ppm, but there is a report on a significant increase in the incidence of liver lesions (basophilia, anisokaryosis, etc.) at or above 500 ppm (34 mg/kg/day) corresponding to Category 2 in another 13-week diet administration test with rats (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances vol. 4 (Ministry of the Environment, 2005)). As for the thyroid, a decrease in thyroxine concentrations was found in females at or above 30 ppm, indicating hypothyroidism. On the other hand, as hematological findings, it is described that significant decreases in hematocrit values, hemoglobin concentration, and erythrocyte counts, suggesting poorly regenerative anemia, were observed at or above 1,000 ppm (50 mg/kg/day) corresponding to the guidance values for Category 2 (NTP TOX 7 (1991)), therefore it was classified in Category 2 (blood). |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 |
P273
P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 96-hour LC50 = 0.33 mg/L for fish (Cyprinodon variegatus) (CICAD 60, 2004). |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 |
P273
P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, a degradation rate by BOD: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1982)), and 21-day NOEC = 0.069 mg/L for fish (Jordanella floridae) (ECETOC TR91, 2003). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, a degradation rate by BOD: 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1982)), and 96-hour LC50 = 0.33 mg/L for fish (Cyprinodon variegatus) (CICAD 60, 2004). From the above results, it was classified in Category 1. |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. |
|