Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 107534-96-3
Chemical Name 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-3-(1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)pentan-3-ol
Substance ID m-nite-107534-96-3_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140degC) substances are not available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - It contains oxygen and chlorine, which are chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Of its rat LD50 values documented: 1700, 3350, 3930, 4000, 4260, and > 5000 mg/kg bw (JMPR No. 884 (1994)), "Not classified" category was represented by the largest number of values (from 3350 to > 5000 mg/kg). Thus, the substance was classified into "Not classified" using the JIS classification criteria. Also, all LD50 values documented above except for > 5000 mg/kg fall under Category 5 in the United Nations classification. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Not classified
-
-
- - Its rat LD50 values are > 5000 and > 2000 mg/kg bw (JMPR No. 884 (1994)) and both values fall under "Not classified" category. Thus, the substance was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition) FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Category 2


Danger
H330 P304+P340
P403+P233
P260
P271
P284
P310
P320
P405
P501
Of its rat LD50 values documented: 0.818, 0.371, and 5.093 mg/L (JMPR No. 884 (1994)), each of them represents Category 2, Category 3, or "Not classified". Selecting the value representing the highest toxicity, the substance was classified into Category 2. Regarding its LD50 value of 0.818 mg/L, since the test concentration of > 818 mg/m3 (= > 0.818 mg/L) was higher than its saturated vapour pressure concentration of 27.70*e-11 (mg/L) at 25degC, we judged that the experiment was conducted in dust/mist state. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - Since all three separate dermal irritation tests using rabbits that underwent 4-hour application gave negative results (A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center) (2006)), the substance was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2B
-
Warning
H320 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
In rabbit tests, application of 50 mg caused no irritation (JMPR No. 884 (1994)), and application of 100 mg caused slight irritation (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). Based on these results, the substance was classified into Category 2B. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - Maximization tests using guinea pigs could not determine whether the substance is sensitizing, while the tests using the Buehler method gave negative results. However, since other tests using the maximization method or Buehler method (both are GLP tests) both gave negative results (A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center) (2006)), the substance was classified into "Not classified". FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - Based on negative results acquired in both dominant lethal tests using mice that underwent oral administration and micronucleus tests (both are in vivo mutagenicity tests using somatic cells) (JNPR No. 884 (1994)), the substance was classified into "Not classified". Regarding in vitro mutagenicity tests, both Ames tests and mutation tests using CHO cells gave negative results (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
6 Carcinogenicity Category 2


Warning
H351 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
In 2-year oral administration tests using rats, no increase in tumorigenesis was detected, whereas in 21-month oral administration tests using female mice, a significant increase in rates of developing hepatic adenoma and carcinoma were discovered (JMPR No. 884 (1994)); thus, the substance was classified into Category 2. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
7 Reproductive toxicity Category 2


Warning
H361 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
In oral administration tests using rats conducted during the organogenetic period, an increased post-implantation loss, increased incidences of peromelia, agenesis of claws, and cleft palates were detected at the doses associated with suppressed body weight gain in maternal animals (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). In addition, in other oral administration tests using rats conducted during the organogenetic period, a decreased reproduction rate, increased in number of underdeveloped animals, and increased microphthalmia were detected at the doses associated with suppressed body weight gain in maternal animals (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). Based on these results, the substance was classified into Category 2. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (nervous system)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
In oral administration tests using rats, a state of sedation was observed in female rats at 950 mg/kg and male rats at 1600 mg/kg, and the symptom disappeared in 2 days. Similarly, in other tests, a state of sedation was observed and disappeared in 3 days. In addition, in other tests, lowered activities, prone posture, recumbency, and slowed reflexes were detected at Category 2 guidance doses; and in mice a lowered rate of activity, slowed reflexes, prone posture, and recumbency were also detected at Category 2 guidance doses (A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center) (2006)). Based on these results, the substance was classified into Category 2 (nervous system). FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 2 (eye)


Warning
H373 P260
P314
P501
One-year oral administration tests using beagle dogs (12 females and 12 males) found that NOAEL for cataract induction is 4.5 mg/kg (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). In other tests using beagle dogs that were treated with doses above this NOAEL value, lens opacities were observed in 2 dogs treated with 10 mg/kg/day and one dog treated with 60 mg/kg/day during the weeks 26 and 32 of the test period (JMPR No. 884 (1994)). Based on these results, the substance was classified into Category 2 (eyes). In other reports, oral administration tests using rats found fatty changes in the liver, bile-duct proliferation, and enlargement of the centrilobular hepatocytes (JMPR No. 884 (1994)); however, we considered these could be adaptive changes and did not use these results as grounds for classification. Also, sclerosis of the red pulp of the spleen, associated with sideropenia was mentioned in the same study; however, since no details were provided, we did not use this report either. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
Since its 96-hour LC50 is 0.49 mg/L for crustaceans (mysids) (AQUIRE, 2008), the substance was classified into Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Since its classification for acute toxicity is Category 1 and it is not rapidly degradable (SRC: BioWin V4.10), the substance was classified into Category 1. FY2008 GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (Sep, 2008)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information