Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 3383-96-8
Chemical Name Temephos
Substance ID m-nite-3383-96-8_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Flammable liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is information that it is combustible (ICSC (2007)), but the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a P-O bond, a chemical group associated with self-reactive properties, present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified
-
-
- - It was classified as "Not classified" because it is classified in Division 6.1 in UNRTDG (UN2783), and it was considered to be not applicable to pyrophoric solids, hazards of the highest precedence. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification is not possible because test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified
-
-
- - It contains a metalloid (P), but It was classified as "Not classified" because it is estimated that it does not react vigorously with from data: it is insoluble in water (ICSC (2007)). FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
14 Oxidizing solids Classification not possible
-
-
- - The substance is an organic compound containing oxygen (but not fluorine or chlorine) which is chemically bonded to an element (P) other than carbon or hydrogen. However, the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - It is a solid with a melting point of 55 deg C or lower, but the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
17 Desensitized explosives Not classified
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. It was classified as "Not classified." FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rats: 4,000-13,000 mg/kg (JMPR (2006))
(2) LD50 for rats: male: 8,000 mg/kg, female: 13,000 mg/kg (ACGIH (7th, 2019))
(3) LD50 for rats: male: 8,600 mg/kg, female: 13,000 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on July 2019))

[Reference Data, etc.]
(4) LD50 for rats: 1,226-13,000 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012))
(5) LD50 for rats: 444-2,000 mg/kg (ACGIH (7th, 2019))
(6) LD50 for rats: 444 mg/kg (EPA Pesticide (2000), HSDB (Access on July 2019))
(7) LD50 for rats: 1,000 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on July 2019))
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Category 3


Danger
H311 P302+P352
P361+P364
P280
P312
P321
P405
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
From (1)-(7), based on findings of rabbits, it was classified in Category 3.
The category was changed from the previous classification by the use of new information sources.

[Evidence Data]
(1) LD50 for rabbits: 970-1,850 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012))
(2) LD50 for rabbits: male: 1,850 mg/kg, female: 970 mg/kg (ACGIH (7th, 2019), EPA Pesticide (2000))
(3) LD50 for rabbits: male: 1,930 mg/kg, female: 970 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on July 2019))
(4) LD50 for rabbits: 970 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on July 2019))
(5) LD50 for rats: >4,000 mg/kg (PATTY (6th, 2012), ACGIH (7th, 2019), HSDB (Access on July 2019))
(6) LD50 for rats: 2,000 to > 4,000 mg/kg (JMPR (2006))
(7) LD50 for rats: 1,370 mg/kg (HSDB (Access on July 2019))
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified (Not applicable)."
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1), because it was impossible to identify the category, it was classified as "Classification not possible."
Besides, since the LC50 values were higher than the saturated vapor concentration (0.000002 mg/L), the reference value in units of mg/L was applied as the dust.

[Evidence Data]
(1) LC50 for rats (4 hours): >1,300 mg/m3 (1.3 mg/L) (PATTY (6th, 2012), ACGIH (7th, 2019), HSDB (Access on July 2019)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(2) LC50 for rats (exposure time unknown): >4.79 mg/L (JMPR (2006)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) In a skin irritation test with rabbits according to EPA OPPTS 870.2500, no irritating effects were observed (primary irritation score 1.4) (EPA Pesticide (2000), HSDB (Access on July 2019)).
(2) This substance was not an irritant to the eyes and skin of rabbits (JMPR (2006)).
(3) This substance was slightly irritating to the skin and eyes. However, it was not a skin sensitizer (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2B
-
Warning
H320 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) and (2), it was classified in Category 2B.

[Evidence Data]
(1) In an eye irritation test with rabbits according to EPA OPPTS 870.2400, slight irritation was observed (EPA Pesticide (2000), HSDB (Access on July 2019)).
(2) This substance was slightly irritating to the skin and eyes. However, it was not a skin sensitizer (PATTY (6th, 2012)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(3) This substance was not irritating to the eyes and the skin of rabbits (JMPR (2006)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) This substance was slightly irritating to the eyes but not irritating and sensitizing to the skin (EPA Pesticide (2000), HSDB (Access on July 2019)).
(2) In a skin sensitization test (Buehler method) with guinea pigs, this substance was not sensitizing to the skin (JMPR (2006)).
(3) This substance was slightly irritating to the skin and eyes, however, it was not a skin sensitizer (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
There was no in vivo data, therefore, classification was not possible due to lack of data.

[Evidence Data]
(1) As for in vitro, negative results were reported in a bacterial reverse mutation test, and a chromosome aberration test and an unscheduled DNA synthesis test with cultured mammalian cells (PATTY (6th, 2012)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on the classification results by other organizations in (1), it was classified as "Classification not possible" in accordance with the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government.

[Evidence Data]
(1) As the classification results by domestic and international organizations, it was classified as A4 by ACGIH (ACGIH (7th, 2019)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Reproductive toxicity Not classified
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1) and (2), it was classified as "Not classified."

[Evidence Data]
(1) In a three-generation reproductive toxicity test with rats by feeding, no reproductive and developmental effects were observed (ACGIH (7th, 2019), PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(2) In a developmental toxicity test with rabbits by oral or dermal administration, reduced body weight gain was seen in maternal animals by dermal application. No developmental toxicity was observed, however, in either administration route (ACGIH (7th, 2019), PATTY (6th, 2012)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(3) In an oral administration test at one dose throughout mating, gestation, parturition and lactation, no effects on the number of litters, litter size, viability of young, or incidence of malformations were observed. However, inhibition of RBC cholinesterase activity in dams and 21-day-old pups (90% decrease in dams and 30% decrease in pups) was observed (ACGIH (7th, 2019), PATTY (6th, 2012))
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (nervous system)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
There was no information on single exposure in humans. Based on (1)-(3), it was classified in Category 2 (nervous system).

[Evidence Data]
(1) This substance is an organophosphorus pesticide and affects the nervous system due to inhibition of cholinesterase (ACGIH (7th, 2019), IPCS, PIM G001 (1986)).
(2) In oral exposure tests with rats and mice, this substance caused typical signs of organophosphate poisoning with single doses as low as 500 mg/kg (corresponding to Category 2) (ACGIH (7th, 2019), PATTY (6th, 2012)).
(3) Signs of toxicity observed in animals treated with high doses of this substance are typical of acute toxicity signs induced by cholinesterase inhibition such as hypoactivity, labored breathing, rough coat, chromodacryorrhea, salivation, muscle spasms and tremors (EPA Pesticide (2000)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(4) This substance might cause cholinesterase inhibition in humans, affecting the nervous system to result in nausea, dizziness and confusion. A large amount of exposure (accidents or leakages) may cause respiratory distress and result in death (HSDB (Access on July 2019)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 1 (nervous system)


Danger
H372 P260
P264
P270
P314
P501
[Rationale for the Classification]
Based on (1)-(3), in oral dose tests with experimental animals, cholinesterase activity inhibition was observed in erythrocytes at doses within the range for Category 1 and in the brain at doses within the range for Category 2. Therefore, it was classified in Category 1 (nervous system).

[Evidence Data]
(1) In a 90-day feeding test with rats at 2-350 ppm, inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase activity was observed at or above 18 ppm (0.9 mg/kg/day, within the range for Category 1) (ACGIH (7th, 2019)).
(2) In a 129-day feeding test with dogs at 10, 50 ppm, inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase activity was observed at 50 ppm (3-4 mg/kg/day, within the range for Category 1) (ACGIH (7th, 2019), JMPR (2006)).
(3) In a 2-year feeding test with dogs, cholinergic symptoms, inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase activity and inhibition of brain cholinesterase activity were observed at 12.5 mg/kg/day (within the range for Category 2) (JMPR (2006)).

[Reference Data, etc.]
(4) In humans, repeated oral doses of up to 3.7 mg/kg were without cholinergic effects (ACGIH (7th, 2019)).
(5) In humans exposed to this substance at 1.1 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks, or at 4.27 mg/kg/day for 5 days, there was no inhibition of cholinesterase activity in erythrocytes or plasma (JMPR (2006)).
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - [Rationale for the Classification]
Classification not possible due to lack of data.
FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
it was classified in Category 1 from 48-hour EC50 = 0.00054 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (U.S.EPA: OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database, 2019). FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Reliable chronic toxicity data were not obtained. It was classified in Category 1 because it is not rapidly degradable (BIOWIN), and it was classified in Category 1 in acute toxicity. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2019 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information