Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 3689-24-5
Chemical Name sulfotep
Substance ID m-nite-3689-24-5_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecules. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
6 Flammable liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Although it was combustible, since the data on flash point was not found, based on the UNRTDG class 6.1, it was considered as out of Category. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Not classified
-
-
- - Not classified based on UNRTDG Class: 6.1, though containing P-O bonds as chemical groups associated with self-reactive properties present FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the UNRTDG class 6.1, it carried out the outside of Category. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metaloids(B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
13 Oxidizing liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Not classified because of UNRTDG Class: 6.1 though containing oxygen bonded to other than carbon and hydrogen. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no -0-0- structure FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although there is a statement (Merck (13th, 2001)) of corroding steel, since there is no rest of database, it cannot be classified. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 2


Danger
H300 P301+P310
P264
P270
P321
P330
P405
P501
It was set as Category 2 based on LD50=5.35 mg/kg. This value was calculated by ten data of rats(ACGIH(2005), DFGOT vol.13(1999)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Category 1


Danger
H310 P302+P352
P361+P364
P262
P264
P270
P280
P310
P321
P405
P501
Rat LD50 = 262mg/kg (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999)), was compared with the lower LD50 = 5mg/kg among rabbit two data (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999)). And it was set as Category 1 based on the lower LD50 = 5mg/kg. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Category 1


Danger
H330 P304+P340
P403+P233
P260
P271
P284
P310
P320
P405
P501
Since the saturated vapor pressures concentrations pressure of this product is 0.2ppm, it is thought that the inhalation experiments was conducted in mist conditions. Based on LC50 = 0.038mg/L which is lower value among two rat data (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)), it was set as Category 1. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
There are results that skin irritation was not observed on rabbit (ACGIH and (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), and PATTY (5th, 2001)), however, there are many descriptions on humans that it stimulates skin and causes disorder (ACGIH (2005), ICSC (J), (1999), HSDB (2005), HSFS (2000), SITTIG (2002)). Since there was no statement about the disorder and concrete description or a grade of the stimulativeness on humans, taking the larger side with danger, it was classified as Category 2. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2B
-
Warning
H320 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
Based on a statement although a stimulus and redness were acknowledged in the eye with the rabbit, it recovered within 24 hours (ACGIH and (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)), and that an eye was stimulated in humans and pains and blurred visions were produced (ICSC (J), (1999), HSFS (2000), SITTIG (2002)), it was set as Category 2B. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although there was a statement that contact dermatitis was produced by chronic exposures in humans(HSDB (2005)), it was the only statement on hand and the number of cases was unknown. Therefore, it was decided that it could not be classified due to the insufficiency of data.. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - We found no results of human over generation epidemiology, and it gave negative for the dominant lethality examination with the mouse (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001), negative for the micronucleus test with mouse bone marrow cells (DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)). Therefore we classified it as Out Of Category. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
6 Carcinogenicity Not classified
-
-
- - Based on being classified into A4 according to ACGIH (ACGIH (2005)), it considered as the outside of Category. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
7 Reproductive toxicity Category 2


Warning
H361 P308+P313
P201
P202
P280
P405
P501
It is observed that no effects on reproduction of parents and development and growth of offsprings in multiple organogenetic period administration tests in rats and rabbits(ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)) and in a rat two-generation administration test (DFGOT vol.13 (1999), but it is observed increase empryo absortion and decrease fetal weight at dose occuring toxicity on maternal animal in one rat organogenetic period administration test (DFGOT vol.13 (1999)). Based on this data, it was classified into class 2.
FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 1 (nervous system), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation)



Danger
Warning
H370
H335
P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P321
P405
P501
P304+P340
P403+P233
P261
P271
P312
In many studies using rat, mouse, rabbit, dog and cat, there is the description about the symptoms of typical organophosphorus compound toxicity, and inhibition of cholinesterase in the central and peripheral nerve, in the dose in the range of the guidance value of Category 1 (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)). There is the description about the symptoms of phosphororganic compound toxicity as headache, malevolence/vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, weakness, muscular pain, anxiousness, closeness, salivation, lachrymation, drowsiness in human (ACGIH (2005), PATTY (5th, 2001)). Moreover, there is a description that "stimulating lungs and producing coughing and closeness in the inhalation" at humans (HSFS (2000)). It is classified into Category 1 (nervous systems) and 3 (respiratory irritation) from the above thing. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Category 1 (nervous system, lung)


Danger
H372 P260
P264
P270
P314
P501
It was classified to as Category 1 (nerve systems) based on that in oral study to rats and dogs, with the dosage of guidance value within the limits of Category 1, cholinesterase inhibition in red corpuscles and/or plasma and relevant symptoms such as the convulsion, tremor, vomiting and diarrhea etc., were observed (ACGIH (2005), DFGOT vol.13 (1999), PATTY (5th, 2001)). Moreover, it was classified to as Category 1 (lungs) based on that in the rat inhalation test with the dosage of guidance value within the limits of Category 1, pulmonary edema and relevant the increase in weight (absolutely weights and relative weights) of the lungs is observed (ACGIH and (2005),DFGOT vol.13 (1999) and PATTY (5th, 2001)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 1


Warning
H400 P273
P391
P501
It was classified into Category 1 from 48-hour LC50=0.23microg/L of Crustacea (Daphnia magna) (AQUIRE, 2003). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 1


Warning
H410 P273
P391
P501
Classified into Category 1, since acute toxicity was Category 1, supposed not rapidly degrading (BIOWIN), though supposed less bioaccumulative (log Kow=3.99(PHYSPROP Database, 2005)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information