Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 39807-15-3 |
Chemical Name | 5-tert-Butyl-3-[2,4-dichlor-5-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one; Oxadiargyl |
Substance ID | m-nite-39807-15-3_v2 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is a chemical group associated with explosive properties (acetylenes) present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
7 | Flammable solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is a chemical group associated with explosive properties (acetylenes) present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing chlorine and oxygen (but not fluorine) which are chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is a chemical group associated with explosive properties (acetylenes) present in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. | FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] It was classified as "Not classified" from (1). [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rats: > 5,000 mg/kg (GLP) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007)) |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] It was classified as "Not classified" from (1). [Evidence Data] (1) LD50 for rats: > 2,000 mg/kg (GLP) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007)) |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Solid (GHS definition). It was classified as "Not classified." |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] It was classified as "Not classified" from (1). [Evidence Data] (1) LC50 for rats (4 hours): > 5.16 mg/L (GLP) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)) |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] It was classified as "Not classified" from (1). [Evidence Data] (1) It is reported that in a skin irritation test with rabbits (n = 6) (GLP, 4-hour application, 72-hour observation), no skin irritation reactions were seen in any animal (erythema/eschar score: 0/0/0/0/0/0, edema score: 0/0/0/0/0/0) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] It was classified as "Not classified" from (1). [Evidence Data] (1) It is reported that in an eye irritation test with rabbits (n = 6) (GLP, 15-day observation), all the animals showed slight conjunctivitis after 24, 48 hours, but 5 animals recovered within 72 hours, and 1 recovered within 15 days (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Category 1B |
Warning |
H317 | P302+P352 P333+P313 P362+P364 P261 P272 P280 P321 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] It was classified in Category 1B from (1), (2). [Evidence Data] (1) It is reported that in a maximization test with guinea pigs (n = 20) (GLP, intradermal administration: 5% solution), a sensitization rate was 40% (8/20) after the first challenge and 25% (5/20) after the second challenge (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (2) The Food Safety Commission of Japan concluded that slight sensitizing potential was observed based on (1) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) to (4), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) In a micronucleus test using the bone marrow from mice (oral administrations, GLP), negative results were reported (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (2) In vivo/in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) tests using the mouse primary cultured hepatocytes (GLP), negative results were reported (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (3) In a bacterial reverse mutation test (GLP), negative results were reported (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (4) In a gene mutation test using the mouse lymphoma cells (GLP), negative results were reported (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H351 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] There was no classification result by domestic and international organizations. Based on (1) and (2), it was classified in Category 2. [Evidence Data] (1) In a 2-year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study with rats by feeding (OECD TG 451, GLP), no evidence of carcinogenicity was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (2) In an 18-month carcinogenicity study with mice dosed by feeding (OECD TG 453, GLP), an increase in hepatocellular tumors (mainly, hepatocellular adenomas) was observed in males at the highest dose (2,000 ppm) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). [Reference Data, etc.] (3) To investigate the mechanism of liver tumors in mice, a hepatotoxicity test and an oxidative stress test in the primary culture of hepatocytes were conducted. As a result, the enzyme inducing activity was observed although it was lower than that in phenobarbital. It was also considered that no oxidative stress of hepatocytes was enhanced, and based on the genotoxicity test result, this substance was determined to be non-genotoxic. Therefore, it was considered that carcinogenicity of this substance to the liver was not a genotoxic mechanism (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H361 | P308+P313 P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1), it was classified in Category 2. [Evidence Data] (1) It was reported that in a two-generation reproduction toxicity study with rats dosed by feeding (GLP), complete embryo resorption (2 cases) and deaths of all liveborn pups (one case) (F1 females) were observed in parental animals at 150 ppm (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). [Reference Data, etc.] (2) It was reported that in a developmental toxicity study with rats dosed by gavage (GLP, gestation days 6 to 15), reduced body weight gain in parental animals, lower body weight in pups, and an increase in the incidence of paleness and delayed ossification of dwarfs and fetuses were observed at 320 mg/kg/day, but no teratogenicity was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (3) It was reported that in a developmental toxicity study with rabbits dosed by gavage, no teratogenicity was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (4) Under the EU CLP, it was classified in Repr. 2 |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Not classified |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) to (5), it was classified as "Not classified." [Evidence Data] (1) It was reported that in an acute oral toxicity test with rats (GLP), at 5,000 mg/kg (in the range corresponding to "Not classified"), neither death nor symptom was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (2) It was reported that in an acute oral toxicity test (GLP) with mice, at 5,000 mg/kg (in the range corresponding to "Not classified"), neither death nor symptom was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (3) It was reported that in an acute neurotoxicity test with rats by oral administration (GLP), no neurotoxicity was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (4) It was reported that in an acute dermal toxicity test with rats (GLP), at 2,000 mg/kg (within the range for Category 2), neither death nor symptom was observed (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (5) It was reported that in an acute (dust) inhalation toxicity test with rats (for 4 hours, GLP), at 5.16 mg/L there was no death case and no specific effect was observed (in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 1 (liver) |
Danger |
H372 | P260 P264 P270 P314 P501 |
[Rationale for the Classification] Based on (1) to (5), the target organ was considered to be the liver, and effects were observed within the dosage range for Category 1, therefore, it was classified in Category 1 (liver). [Evidence Data] (1) It was reported that in a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study with rats dosed by feeding (GLP), an increase in serum T4 levels was observed at or above 200 ppm (13.5 mg/kg/day (males), 15.5 mg/kg/day (females), within the range for Category 2); and increases in T.Chol, TP, and Alb, an increase in TSH, increases in relative liver and kidney weight, hypertrophy and darkening of the liver, darkening of the kidney, centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy, and an increase in T3 (males) were observed at or above 6,000 ppm (412 mg/kg/day (males), 474 mg/kg/day (females), in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (2) It was reported that in a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study with mice dosed by feeding (GLP), centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy (males) was observed at or above 200 ppm (29.1 mg/kg/day (males), 37.0 mg/kg/day (females), within the range for Category 2); and an increase in relative liver weight, deposit of brown pigments in hepatocytes, bile canaliculi, sinusoid, macrophages in sinusoid (males), and centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy (females) were observed at or above 2,000 ppm (290 mg/kg/day (males), 363 mg/kg/day (females), in the range corresponding to "Not classified") (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (3) It was reported that in a one-year chronic toxicity study with dogs dosed by feeding (GLP), liver effects (an increase in ALT, deposit of pigments in bile canaliculi and Kupffer cells, centrilobular pigmentation, pigment phagocytosis of liver macrophages) were observed at or above 3 mg/kg/day (within the range for Category 1); and liver effects (interlobular fibrosis with pigmentation of liver macrophage, increases in ALP and AST) and gall bladder effects (dark-colored visous matter/puruloid matter in the gall bladder, calcinosis in the gall bladder) were observed at 10 mg/kg/day (within the range for Category 1) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (4) It was reported that in a two-year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study with rats dosed by feeding (GLP), hepatocyte pigmentation (males) was observed at or above 50 ppm (2.1 mg/kg/day (males), 2.5 mg/kg/day (females), within the range for Category 1); and hematological effects (decreases in Ht, Hb, MCH, MCV and MCHC), liver effects (an increase in relative weight, centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy (males)) and kidney effects (an increase in relative weight, brown pigmentation in the renal tubules) were observed at or above 500 ppm (21.5 mg/kg/day (males), 25.0 mg/kg/day (females), within the range for Category 2) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). (5) It was reported that in an 18-month combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study with mice dosed by feeding (GLP), liver effects (an increase in relative weight, pigmentation in hepatic Kupffer cells) were observed at or above 200 ppm (24.3 mg/kg/day (males), 30.8 mg/kg/day (females), within the range for Category 2) (Risk Assessment Report (Pesticides) (Food Safety Commission of Japan, 2007), A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | [Rationale for the Classification] Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
FY2020 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 72-hour ErC50 = 0.0073 mg/L for algae (Raphidocelis subcapitata) (Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2013). | FY2021 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (BIOWIN) and 72-hour NOErC = 0.000613 mg/L for algae (Raphidocelis subcapitata) (Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2013). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained (crustacea, fish), then it is classified as "Not classified" due to being not rapidly degradable, 48-hour EC50 > 0.351 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna), 96-hour LC50> 0.89 mg/L for fish (Cyprinus carpio) (both, limit tests, Document for registration standards for agricultural chemicals set by the Minister of Environment to prevent harm to animals and plants in areas of public waters, 2013), and a low bioaccumulation estimate (logKow= 3.94 (A pesticide abstract and evaluation report (Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center, 2008)). By drawing a comparison between the above results, it was classified in Category 1. |
FY2021 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. | FY2021 | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2019 revised edition (Ver. 2.0)) |
|