Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN 446-35-5
Chemical Name 2,4-Difluoro-1-nitrobenzene
Substance ID m-nite-446-35-5_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Classification not possible
-
-
- - Although there is a chemical group associated with explosive properties (nitro group) in the molecule, and oxygen balance of -116 is above the criteria, -200, the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Flammable liquids Category 4
-
Warning
H227 P370+P378
P210
P280
P403
P501
Based on a flash point data of 91 deg C (closed cup) (Sigma-Aldrich (2017)), it was classified in Category 4. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a chemical group associated with explosive properties (nitro group) in the molecule, but the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of 480 deg C (BUA 252 (2004)). FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
13 Oxidizing liquids Classification not possible
-
-
- - It is an organic compound which does not contain chlorine but contains fluorine and oxygen, and the oxygen is chemically bonded to the element other than carbon or hydrogen (N). However, the classification is not possible due to no data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
15 Organic peroxides Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Category 3


Danger
H301 P301+P310
P264
P270
P321
P330
P405
P501
Based on reports of LD50 values for rats of 194 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)), it was classified in Category 3. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Category 2


Danger
H310 P302+P352
P361+P364
P262
P264
P270
P280
P310
P321
P405
P501
There is a report of an LD50 value for rats of 84 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)), and it corresponds to Category 2. There is a report of an LD50 value for rabbits of 207 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)), and it corresponds to Category 3. It was classified in Category 2 by adopting the category with higher hazard. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (GHS definition) FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a report that in an 8-hour inhalation exposure test with rats, no death occurred at about 1.78 mg/L (274 ppm) (converted 4-hour equivalent value: 2.52 mg/L (387 ppm)) (BUA 252 (2004)), however, since it is not possible to specify the category only with this data, it was classified as "Classification not possible." Besides, since the exposure concentration is lower than 90% of the saturated vapor pressure concentration (2.17 mg/L (335 ppm)), a reference value in the unit of ppm was applied as vapor with little mist. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, this substance has high dermal toxicity, and in a skin irritation test with rabbits, animals died on an application of an undiluted solution. There is a report that as 1 mL of an undiluted solution was washed 15 minutes after application, no irritation was shown in a 14-day observation (BUA 252 (2004)). However, it was not adopted because the experimental conditions were insufficient. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible
-
-
- - In an eye irritation test with rabbits (OECD TG 405-compliant), no effect was observed on the cornea and iris, and redness of score 2 and edema of score 1 were observed 1 hour after an application to the conjunctiva. However, they decreased after 2 days, and the irritation score (MMAS) was 4.7 (ECETOC TR48 (1998)). Similarly, there is a description that in an eye irritation test with rabbits, the irritation scores after 1, 7, 24, 48, 72 hours were 5, 2, 14, 10, 11, respectively, and slight irritation was observed (BUA 252 (2004)). On the other hand, it is also described that it was not irritating to the eyes (BUA 252 (2004)), therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible." The category was changed by reviewing information. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - There is a report that, in order to investigate the delayed type hypersensitivity skin reaction, this substance was applied to 96 volunteers, and challenge treatments were done to 30 people whose skin reaction disappeared after the introduction, and as the result, positive responses were observed in 27 of them (90%) (BUA 252 (2004)). However, the details of the results of the control group etc. are unknown, and it is not possible to conclude that this substance is positive based on this result, therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible." FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Category 2 (nervous system, blood system)


Warning
H371 P308+P311
P260
P264
P270
P405
P501
There is no information on single exposure to this substance in humans. As for experimental animals, there is a report that in a single oral dose test with rats, the methemoglobin concentration in the blood rose up to a maximum 6% at a dose of 80 mg/kg, and it decreased to less than 2% after 48 hours (BUA 252 (2004)). In addition, there are reports that in other two single oral dose tests with rats, staggering gait, crouching position, ventral or lateral position, convulsions, tremors and lacrimation were observed. Although there is no detailed description of the dosage at which these effects were observed, it is considered to be in the range for Category 1 near the LD50 values of 197 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)). Moreover, there is a report that in a single oral administration in cats at 100 mg/kg, the methemoglobin concentration in the blood rose up to 8.5 to 11%; Heinz body formation and blue discoloration of the tongue were observed: they showed muscle tremors, twitching, salivation, and gasping and died within 2 hours (BUA 252 (2004)). As for the dermal route, there is a report that in a single dermal exposure test with rabbits, disturbance of the equilibrium sense, muscle tremor, twitch were observed at or above 160 mg/kg; cyanosis, an increased respiration rate, and yellow urine were observed at or above at or above 200 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)). Additionally, in a single dermal exposure test with rats, they showed a crouching or prone position, tremors, and convulsions and died after 2 hours to 2 days. Although there is no detailed description of the dosage at which these effects were observed, it is considered to be in the range for Category 1 near the LD50 value of 84 mg/kg (BUA 252 (2004)).
By summarizing the above information, the target organs of this substance are considered to be the nervous system and haemal system. The effects on experimental animals are all observed at dosages within the range for Category 1. They correspond to Category 1 from the guidance value, however, it is the data from BUA which are an information source in List 2, and it does not satisfy the criterion 1b3) (OECDTG test and GLP compliance test). Therefore, it was classified in Category 2 (nervous system, haemal system) according to the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government. The classification result was changed from the previous classification.
FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible
-
-
- - Classification not possible due to lack of data. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Category 2
-
-
H401 P273
P501
From 96-hour LC50 = 7.1 mg/L for fish (Danio rerio) (BUA vol.252: 2004), it was classified in Category 2. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Category 2


-
H411 P273
P391
P501
Chronic toxicity data were not obtained. Due to being not rapidly degradable (BioWin), and acute toxicity Category 2, it was classified in Category 2. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2017 GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition (Ver. 1.1))


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information