Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 90-30-2 |
Chemical Name | 1-(N-Phenylamino)naphthalene |
Substance ID | m-nite-90-30-2_v1 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | To Guidance List |
UN GHS document (External link) | To UN GHS document |
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) | To FAQ |
List of Information Sources (Excel file) | List of Information Sources |
List of Definitions/Abbreviations | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) | To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW) |
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) | To Workplace Safety Site (MHLW) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | To OECD/eChemPortal (External link) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Aerosols | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Flammable solids | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | There is information that it is combustible (ICSC (J) (Access on July 2012)), but the classification is not possible due to no data. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is estimated that it does not ignite at normal temperatures from an autoignition temperature of > 500 deg C (MSDS (Merck) (2010)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid (melting point <= 140 deg C) substances are not available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no oxygen, fluorine or chlorine. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Test methods applicable to solid substances are not available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
17 | Desensitized explosives | - |
- |
- | - | - | - | - |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H302 | P301+P312 P264 P270 P330 P501 |
There is a report on five LD50 values for rats (> 5,000 mg/kg, 200-2,000 mg/kg, 2,380 mg/kg, 1,630 mg/kg, 1,625 mg/kg) (all USEPA/HPV (2003), corresponding to List 1), two of them correspond to "Not classified" (in the Classification JIS), two to Category 4, and one corresponds to Category 3-4. It was classified in Category 4 to which most corresponded. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" based on an LD50 value of > 5,000 mg/kg for rabbits (USEPA/HPV (2003)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not classified (Not applicable) |
- |
- | - | Solid (GHS definition) | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | It is reported that there were no deaths (0/6) after 8-hour exposure to the saturated vapour in rats (USEPA/HPV (2003)), but the category cannot be determined with this result alone. Therefore, the classification is not possible. Besides, the saturated vapour pressure concentration is 9.78E-05 mg/L. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | In a test with rabbits (US FDA standard), a slight positive reaction was observed in three out of six animals, and it was judged as a very slight irritant (CICAD 9 (1998)), and in another test with rabbits (OECD TG 404), slight erythema and edema were found in one out of three animals 1 hour after removal of the patch, but these disappeared after 24 or 72 hours, and it was judged to be not a skin irritant (CICAD 9 (1998)). Therefore, it was classified as "Not classified." | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" because it is reported that it was not irritating in a test with rabbits (OECD TG 405) (USEPA/HPV (2003)), and in another test with rabbits (FDA Guidelines), slight conjunctivitis was observed in four out of six animals, but this disappeared after seven days (BUA Report 113 (1994)). Besides, an irritation score for the conjunctiva is less than 2 for slight conjunctivitis, and it is not regarded as a positive reaction in classification. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
4 | Skin sensitization | Category 1 |
Warning |
H317 | P302+P352 P333+P313 P362+P364 P261 P272 P280 P321 P501 |
In a maximization test with guinea pigs (OECD TG 406), a positive rate increased from 75% (15/20) to 90% (18/20) with increasing concentration for the challenge, and it was shown to be a strong sensitizer (CICAD 9 (1998)), and it was listed as a contact allergen in Contact Dermatitis (Frosch) (5th, 2011) (corresponding to List 1). Therefore, it was classified in Category 1. Besides, in humans, three are many case reports in which patients with contact dermatitis showed positive reactions in patch tests on the substance (USEPA/HPV (2003)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It was classified as "Not classified" based on a negative result in a dominant lethal test in which male mice were intraperitoneally administered and mated with untreated females (in vivo heritable germ cell mutagenicity test) (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)). Besides, as for in vitro tests, it is reported that it was negative in all of an Ames test (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)), a gene mutation test with L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)), and chromosomal aberration tests with CHO cells (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)) or CHL cells (USEPA/HPV (2003)) of Chinese hamsters. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | As for carcinogenicity test results available for the substance, they were inadequate for the evaluation of carcinogenicity because tests were not according to the current standard procedures (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)). And it is reported that an increased occurrence of cancers was observed in an epidemiological study of occupationally exposed workers, but it is described that it is not possible to attribute this finding solely to 1-(N-phenylamino)naphthalene because of the small number of deaths from cancers and concomitant exposure to other chemicals (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)). From the above, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data. Besides, as for animal tests, it is reported that the incidence of lung carcinoma and the combined incidence of hemangiosarcoma in the kidney and the other organs significantly increased after 27-time subcutaneous administration to mice over nine weeks (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Data are lacking. Besides, as the information in the administration routes that could not be used for classification, it is reported that slight fatty degeneration in the liver was observed three months after subcutaneous administration of 200 mg/kg to rabbits (HSDB (2005)), and a slightly increased methemoglobin level was found within 10 minutes after intraperitoneal administration to mice (HSDB (2005)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Data are lacking. Besides, no exposure-related adverse effects were observed in a test by 2-week oral administration of 2,000 mg/kg/day to female rats (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)), and there is a report on fatty degeneration in the liver after 6-week oral administration of 200 mg/kg/day or 5-week dermal administration of a 5% solution to rabbits (CICAD (J) 9 (1998)). However, because the tests had one dose only and the small number of animals (1-3 animals/group) and were not conducted according to the current standard procedures, they are inadequate to use for rationale. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
Hazard class | Classification | Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | Classification year (FY) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H400 | P273 P391 P501 |
It was classified in Category 1 from 72-hour EC50 = 0.034 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2005)). | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) | Category 1 |
Warning |
H410 | P273 P391 P501 |
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, BOD 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1982)), and 72-hour NOEC = 0.0036 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2005)). If acute toxicity data are used for a trophic level for which chronic toxicity data are not obtained, then it is classified in Category 1 due to being not rapidly degradable (not readily degradable, BOD 0% (Biodegradation and Bioconcentration Results of Existing Chemical Substances under the Chemical Substances Control Law, 1982)), and 96-hour LC50 = 0.7 mg/L for fish (Oryzias latipes) (Results of Aquatic Toxicity Tests of Chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan (Ministry of the Environment, 2005)). From the above results, it was classified in Category 1. |
FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | This substance is not listed in the Annexes to the Montreal Protocol. | FY2012 | GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010) |
|