Latest GHS Classification Results by the Japanese Government (edited by NITE)

Japanese



GENERAL INFORMATION
 
Item Information
CAS RN
Chemical Name Coal tar naphtha
Substance ID m-nite-nocas-0008_v1
Download of Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION
Item Information
Guidance used for the classification (External link) To Guidance List
UN GHS document (External link) To UN GHS document
FAQ(GHS classification results by the Japanese Government) To FAQ
List of Information Sources (Excel file) List of Information Sources
List of Definitions/Abbreviations Definitions/Abbreviations
Sample Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Sample SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) To OECD/eChemPortal (External link)

PHYSICAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Explosives Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
2 Flammable gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
3 Aerosols Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Not aerosol products FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Oxidizing gases Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
5 Gases under pressure Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
6 Flammable liquids Category 2


Danger
H225 P303+P361+P353
P370+P378
P403+P235
P210
P233
P240
P241
P242
P243
P280
P501
Since flash point was 21 degC (<23 degC), and initial boiling point was 160 - 300 degC (> 35 degC), it was classified as Category 2. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
7 Flammable solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not classified
-
-
- - Flash point: 270degC (> 70degC)(NFPA , 1997) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
10 Pyrophoric solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible
-
-
- - Test methods applicable to liquid substances are not available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
13 Oxidizing liquids Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
14 Oxidizing solids Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
15 Organic peroxides Classification not possible
-
-
- - UNRTDG No. 3105 Class: 5.2 FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
17 Desensitized explosives -
-
-
- - - - -

HEALTH HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the 5980mg/kg which is statistically calculated values of rat LD50 value using 4 data (IARC47 (1989), EHC20 (1982)), it considered as the outside of Category. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) -
-
Warning
- - Based on rat LD50= 5ml/kg (reduced value of 4.40g/kg) (IARC47 (1989), EHC20 (1982)), it was set as Category 5. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not classified (Not applicable)
-
-
- - Liquid (room temperature) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible
-
-
- - Insufficient data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) -
-
Warning
- - Category 5 because of SPECIES: Rat; ENDPOINT: LC50 (4-8h) VALUE: 5.3mg/L (EHC20, 1982) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2


Warning
H315 P302+P352
P332+P313
P362+P364
P264
P280
P321
Based on the statement of moderate irritation to Aromatic solvents which has a 138 - 264degC boiling range (EHC20 (1982)), it was classified as Category 2. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2A


Warning
H319 P305+P351+P338
P337+P313
P264
P280
Based on the statement of moderately irritation to Aromatic solvents which has a 138 - 264degC boiling range (EHC20 (1982)), it was set as Category 2A. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible
-
-
- - Based on a ststement that in the maximization test (including GLP test ) using a guinea pigs, high-boiling aromatic solvent, coal tar naphtha did not cause the sensitization, it was put outside of the Category. In addition, this result is supported by the statement that sensitization is not indicated in the examination by humans using multiple solvent naphtha with different boiling points(IUCLID (2000)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
4 Skin sensitization Not classified
-
-
- - Based on a ststement that in the maximization test (including GLP test ) using a guinea pigs, high-boiling aromatic solvent, coal tar naphtha did not cause the sensitization, it was put outside of the Category. In addition, this result is supported by the statement that sensitization is not indicated in the examination by humans using multiple solvent naphtha with different boiling points(IUCLID (2000)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Not classified
-
-
- - Based on the description (IUCLID (2000)) that High Flash Aromatic Naphtha or Solvent naphtha gave negative for the in vivo somatic mutagenicity examination (the chromosomal aberration test (GLP), the micronucleus test (GLP)) using rats or mice, we classified it as Out Of Category. In addition, each in vitro mutagenicity test using three kinds of Solvent naphtha among which boiling points differ was negative. (IUCLID(2000)) FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible
-
-
- - It was presupposed that it cannot be categoried by technological direction. Since there is only the European Union classification.
[Notes] Solvent naphtha (coal), Solvent naphtha (petroleum), and light arom. are classified into the category 2 (May cause cancer) according to the European Union classification (ESIS (2006)).
FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
7 Reproductive toxicity Not classified
-
-
- - Influences on the litter's count and fetal survivial and increased cleft palates were observed as a result of the two-generation reproductive toxicity test and developmental toxicity test of High-Flash Aromatic Naphtha (Cas64742-95-6) using rats and mice.
However, this effect was observed only in the group of high-dose causing high motality to maternal animals(motality rate of mother rats and mice is 88% and 44% respectively), and reproductive toxicity or developmental toxicity was not observed at any lower dose rates (IUCLID (2000), Toxicol.Ind.Health, vol.6,441-460, 1990).
Therefore, it was placed out of classification.
FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible
-
-
- - Insufficient data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
10 Aspiration hazard Category 1


Danger
H304 P301+P310
P331
P405
P501
We classified it as Category 1 based on that solvent naphtha has dynamic viscosity of 0.949mm 2/s (30 degrees C) (The Solvent Pocket Book (2001)), and that Aromatic solvent A4 (boiling points 196 to 264 degrees C) showed the fatality rates of 5/10 (EHC20 (1982)). In addition, Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light arom. (Cas 64742-95-6), Solvent naphtha (petroleum) and heavy arom. (Cas 64742-94-5) are classified as R65 (may cause lung damage if swallowed.) (ESIS (2006)). FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
Hazard class Classification Pictogram
Signal word
Hazard statement
(code)
Precautionary statement
(code)
Rationale for the classification Classification year (FY) GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Short term (Acute) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment Long term (Chronic) Classification not possible
-
-
- - No data available. FY2006 GHS Classification Manual (10 Feb, 2006)
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer -
-
-
- - - - -


NOTE:
  • GHS Classification Result by the Japanese Government is intended to provide a reference for preparing a GHS label or SDS for users. To include the same classification result in a label or SDS for Japan is NOT mandatory.
  • Users can cite or copy this classification result when preparing a GHS label or SDS. Please be aware, however, that the responsibility for a label or SDS prepared by citing or copying this classification result lies with users.
  • This GHS classification was conducted based on the information sources and the guidance for classification and judgement which are described in the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government etc. Using other literature, test results etc. as evidence and including different content from this classification result in a label or SDS are allowed.
  • Hazard statement and precautionary statement will show by hovering the mouse cursor over a code in the column of "Hazard statement" and "Precautionary statement," respectively. In the excel file, both the codes and statements are provided.
  • A blank or "-" in the column of "Classification" denotes that a classification for the hazard class was not conducted in the year.
  • An asterisk “*” in the column of “Classification” denotes that “Not classified (or No applicable)” and/or “Classification not possible” is applicable. Details are described in the column of “Rationale for the classification”. If no English translation is available for “Rationale for the classification,” please refer to the Japanese version of the results.

To GHS Information